giving the israeli armed forces complete freedom of movement for further clearing of the gaza strip, and anyone who votes in favour of the text as it is currently worded with their responsibility for that, essentially becoming complacent in the destruction of gaza. moreover, the destruction of gaza. moreover, the text of the draught has lost a reference to condemnations of all indiscriminate attacks on civilians. what signal does this send to the international community? that the security council is giving israel a green light for work crimes. i would like to put a question to members of the security council. why are be together in this room? to rubber it decision that is convenient for washington or to shoulder our mandate for the maintenance of international peace and security. we still believe that we are here for the latter, in order to give the council a chance to save face and preserve its battered reputation of the last two days, be proposed reverting to the wording on