Weve accommodated the design it does not accommodate 9 code compliant roof deck weve made good faith effort and the design accommodates the dines this is our 8 rear yard set back it is 3 hundred square feet and incorporated a design that is 2 stories or in 9 ceda and 3 on the north side matching the properties placing our allowable deck space is 16 foot and third story office was removed no north sidelines and no south side rear windows in the master bedroom it mitigate privacy views and the third floor deck was reduced in length and width a ground floor was put on the south side and it is important to clarify that prior to the dr hearing scheduled on december 4th we contacted the Planning Department well be spending a lot of money on the renovation and it is for your offer sees family we worked to have a less impact to the dr requester and asked. A continuance weve made compromises a summary the third floor is built to the proper line and we had originally a 3 foot gap this change all
Front geary street and i like being catholic this lady is catholic with all due respect unlike all cities we have a tradition not envelope to show you the code by extraordinary impacts like automatically light and air its your job to scale back projects we dont live in a city that encouraged mansions we desire everyone to improve their tax property but the project here go too far in several went first, the process that was used i attended the 311 hearing before the proposal was made and the proponent made several concessions they scaled back 9 deck to not overlook the yards and giving privacy theres one window in the diagram one window on the side of the ancient victorian that gives light they gave a set back when the project went and was proposed they pulled that back on september 4th and proposed a project that went over the top so people would be overlooking the is that a and the backyard and the west of privacy and gave no relief on the privacy ive been in the homes of the presente
To clarify that prior to the dr hearing scheduled on december 4th we contacted the Planning Department well be spending a lot of money on the renovation and it is for your offer sees family we worked to have a less impact to the dr requester and asked. A continuance weve made compromises a summary the third floor is built to the proper line and we had originally a 3 foot gap this change allows functionality for the master bedroom and bathroom the second floor deck is 10 feet and now projects 12 feet it allows a 15 foot that our deck will allow 80 us to enjoy this with our children the slides were the stairs will have a 5 foot set back and together with the drs requesters side deck 12 foot wide allows a 17 foot set back between the dr requesters this set back didnt trigger any he xooerl or exceptional finally, we hope to accommodate two chairs the result is the design we are extremely excited and supported by i did Residential Team and the design does not create exceptional or extraordi
Includes a deck on the roof would not effect the privacy or light and air of the neighboring prospective the proposed rear deck will project 12 foot with 5 foot set back on each side the deck will not present any unusual effect on the defense lawyers property the revised project is not creating any extraordinary exceptional circumstances and the commission not take dr and approve the project as revised thank you dr requester your team has 5 minutes. Hello, im david im here on behalf of tenaciously and sid nen new there was a much smaller project and had fewer impacts on ms. That is weston and mr. Morgan the department recommend inform discretionary review to occur since that time the project sponsor took the plans that were less than twentyfour hours notice and expanded the project not only in depth into the volume as well as Square Footage so and the Department Still buildings this is there are no xooernd exceptional circumstances we totally disagree first of all that building first o
Sent did you agree to it set back to allow the light earlier and it of the initially built without the set back our talking to the dr requester we talked about bringing that in and that way were at the hearing now it was not agreed b upon by the hearing requester we went back to talk to our architect and because we lost that office space we left it off the back of the 3 story we move that space back in so optimize or make the space for optimal. But it could it is a concession i could make a have a fairly goodsized office whats the Square Footage of that room if you cut off the 2 feet. We lose it is jetting in making the bathroom aushgd. Thats the bedroom and part of the master bath i see what youre talking about the deck comes down off. I have a pretty good idea of what were facing. Im sorry may i respond respond to one comment commissioner antonini the 5 foot set back besides the deck are code required set backs the stairs for instance will be relocated into one of the set backs you w