of people as we look at jeffrey epstein there, we know he committed suicide in 2019 as he himself was facing federal charges with respect to as we know the underage victims and a number of things that he did that were horrific, alleged to have done, but the reality is that court has an interest in such protection. at this point to the extent that lot of names have been out there on their own volition, a lot of the information has been made public, the court said okay, now is the time. obviously you have a list like this that comes out, no one wants to be associated with the list. to your very important point, it does not indicate that you were on the list of names that you did anything wrong, but just think about the personal damage, the reputational damage, the professional potential damage whether or not there could be other civil litigation applying to what your involvement was, could there be criminal investigation into it. so any such list that you may potentially be on that invol
fred, good morning to you. what makes ukraine so confident that aid is coming? from where i sit here down the road from the u.s. capitol, it is a tough road. reporter: i ll tell you, i think one of the reasons why the ukrainians are saying that they are confident is because they have to be confident because it is basically the only choice that they have. one of the things that i think we heard him say there, they basically don t have another choice. they have their plan a, they don t have a plan b. because they say if they stop fighting, if they go into anything else, then it will essentially mean the end of their country. one of the other things that he also said in that interesting interview with christiane amanpour is that he believes that vladimir putin does not want to negotiate a just peace with the ukrainians. they don t believe in that also because a lot of the missile strikes by the russians we ve seen the past couple of days. massive barrages launched toward kyiv and ot
theories. here is legal analyst joey jackson. the reason ied you on to talk about this was the issue of defamation. what aaron rodgers said has no basis and no evidence to support it. when does something like that become defamation? yeah, important question to be answered for sure. what happens is remember what defamation is. it s a false statement that is injurious to someone s reputation and as a result of that can cause the person great reputational damage. when you talk about defamation as it relates to public figures, as both jimmy kimmel and aaron rodgers are, you had to show actual malice. what does that mean? you have to show knowledge that you made the statement knowing it was false or just reckless disregard as to whether it was false or true. so it s a very heightened standard. at the end of the day, i don t think it s ripe for defamation. no one would want to be talked about in the same sentence of