seeing its worst weekly loss in more than two years. keep in mind, that feel good signals can abruptly hit the breaks. impeachment hearings begin on wednesday as we enter a new push for the democrats to remove the president from office. with wall street watching, we ll see if they change their minds. neil: thanks as always, my friend. investors are not worrying so maybe shouldn t be worrying is this that depends. with us, charles payne, david bernstein, and what do you think of the collective shrug certainly from the markets, is it justified? i think they view this as a lot of noise. they know that there s a difference between him being impeached than from him being removed from office, which is unlikely to happen. i think what they re paying attention to is trade. republicans pushing forward, hopefully getting nancy pelosi to take up the new nafta, the
on paper, that person stands a better chance of beating the president? i think that bloomberg has a much better chance than elizabeth warren. to tax the wealthy u undermining the entire constitution and entire financial system that alexander hamilton set up. we re in a capitalist society. my grandfather came from italy for a better life and start a business and build wealth for his family. by doing that he created jobs and put money into the economy. why do we want to stop that? maybe our grandfathers met. could be. one of the things, another wrinkle. to focus on the rich, the gab between the average worker and wider than it s ever been. that s something that the republicans ignore at their peril. they don t touch it and often doesn t talk about it.
100%. we just because you don t like the politics in this country, it s because you don t like the president of the united states, you can t attack our executive branch and say let s get rid of the thousands of law enforcement officers from the federal government, just get rid of them. all that does is erode the quality of life in this country. neil: all right. we ll watch it very, very closely. sheriff, thank you for taking the time. you have your hands full. and mark daniels in cochise county, on the front line trying to deal. easy for politicians to talk and he has to deliver the goods day in and day out. thanks for all you do. thank you, neil. neil: and the list of republica republicans witnesses that republicans want queried. so far no response. (employee) enterprise car sales has access to over
one of the things to discuss, there aren t enough billionaires in the world to pay for what elizabeth warren is putting out there. so when it comes to wealth and creating wealth, is that inherently bad, inherently evil? the messaging that republicans need to discuss is the fact that when somebody makes money, when a corporation makes money, they employ people and people who work for a company that they like, that they re treated well, that they stay there. that s a message that needs to get out there and i think that bill gates coming out and taking elizabeth warren on and a statement here is how much i par in taxes, do i have to pay this much. she makes it seem like a minuscule amount, a couple of pennies and add it up, 7, 8, 10 million more. and more in the calculated, bill gates would have to pay 4 had to 6 billion more in taxes. and i think the question is, for democrats, versus republicans on this, democrats have shown they re willing to show they re on the side some
that hump of proving that element, but they haven t put forth that evident at this point. neil: when i look at the list of eight individuals that republicans want to testify before their committee, hunter biden and ukraine whistleblower and fusion gps, tim morrison, the former nsc higher up, david he ll rarpging, and do any of them stand a chance of hell of speaking before that committee? it s not just what they say, but also their credibility. so i think there s going to be a big question, even if you get somebody who says something to get it closer this is what the intent, what is their bias, what is their motive, what is their credibility. so, it s all going to boil down to those interpretations. neil: katie, we ll watch it closely. thank you very much. thanks, neil. neil: in the meantime, fox is learning indeed the former new