and these companies can do these things, use loose explanations and be okay with it. but there is a lesson if you attack the pocketbook and you threaten that, some very real change can occur. because the rnc and the trump campaign said we re not going to buy any more twitter advertising until you relent. you think that s why twitter backed down? i think it might be two-pronged. that s a piece of it. imagine it s not just the trump campaign and the republican party, all republic answer did it. look, if they actually want the most amount 6 business, why disinfranchise this part of the country. this was indefensible, senate majority leader political team, simply cataloging the hostility and the radicalism, he s the one that should get penalized for that? it s inexcusable, pattern of behavior and their excuses are preliminary si at best. this is a major issue led
something that justifies why they re charging those deuce, people will gladly pay them. people pay $3, $4, $5 for a cup of coffee, they re getting value. they ll pay less than that for union deuce if the union is delivering to collective bargaining other things, the types of things they ever historically offered and say they re offering going forward. the onus is on the union to justify and prove the value proposition to the individual worker who would gladly pay if the value proposition is there. neil: i know you re focused as you should be what s going on in your fine state of kentucky. you also are a rising star in the republican party. and your win proved that when you were polling quite a ways back of your opponent and scored a comfortable victory. if you ll indulge me on what s going in washington, republic answer might have stumbled out of the gate. i don t mean to disparage the party. but with the ethics committee