also working for. and, on top of that the state department, in official government business that uma abidine was doing while being paid by us, by the taxpayers and while hillary clinton was secretary of state. i think what we need to highlight here, i read that email. i saw that where it shows uma abidine, don t forget, hillary clinton s aid, while at the state department, asking for the state department to agree to accept money from congo in north korea to, as you point out. repressive regimes that go into the clinton foundation. the question is how much more money that didn t have to go through to get approved by the state department came in from other repressive governments that went directly into the clinton foundation? how much of that foundation is from repressive regimes and what are they asking for? we don t know and you are right to point that out. the reason we are getting a snapshot of some emails is that a conservative, we should point out conservative activist david
also working for. and, on top of that the state department, in official government business that uma abidine was doing while being paid by us, by the taxpayers and while hillary clinton was secretary of state. i think what we need to highlight here, i read that email. i saw that where it shows uma abidine, don t forget, hillary clinton s aid, while at the state department, asking for the state department to agree to accept money from congo in north korea to, as you point out. repressive regimes that go into the clinton foundation. the question is how much more money that didn t have to go through to get approved by the state department came in from other repressive governments that went directly into the clinton foundation? how much of that foundation is from repressive regimes and what are they asking for? we don t know and you are right to point that out. the reason we are getting a snapshot of some emails is that a conservative, we should point out conservative activist david
exactly? we re about to figure this out, i m guessing. well, maybe. the revolutionary court is a regular feature of repressive regimes. so the aspect of secret evidence no publicity, and very, very, very thin evidence, it s really an extension of politics that you have seen in places like saddam s iraq, hitler s determineie in now iran. we don t have an idea whether they re about to let him go or question to taken him for 20 or what? i think the chances of letting him go or slim and none. this is just pure diplomacy weighing in. there s an appeals process, statutoriry. so, it s possible they ll do a very harsh sentence and then the political powers that be might indicate on appeal for clemency or release. that s possible but not like lie. how do the politics of all of this relate to the politics of the nuclear deal? the president and others say keep the two separate. but we re in the real world
this week two very unfortunate reminders of the perils that reporters face when trying to inform all of us about conflict zones and repressive regimes. today marks 1,013 days since freelance journalist austin tice went missing in syria. at the time he vanished he had contributed to news outlets like cbs and the washington post. and on tuesday his mother debra tice held a press conference in beirut where she made an emotional plea to the u.s. and syrian governments asking them to work together to secure her son s release. and for the first time in a long time she gave us a specific flicker of hope that her son is still alive. we ask both governments to work together and to work effectively to locate austin and
i think the president has not strengthened this country or strengthened the hands of citizens in repressive regimes. i ll be happy if in two years there is more liberty for the residents of cuba but that has not been the case with his outreach to iran, to the taliban and to the muslim world. i wish it were but i think people in the government of these countries see what the president is doing as weakness. real quickly, i want to turn to the hacking of sony. the president said americans should go to the movies, to the world it looks like sony, the theaters, maybe the american people blinked. what do you think about the idea of the president having a showi showing of the interview at the white house? would that show how we respond to these threats? i think it s interesting. if it weren t a slapstick