own words, took back his own stuff, took back memorabilia that he thought was his. so october first is the first date that o.j. simpson will once again walk out of prison a free man. katie fang, msnbc legal analyst standing by. i saw you nodding disapprovalel at something that was said. that s actually highly unusual. caveat is all hail to the chief. art was emphasizing how normal in process was. what s not normal is o.j. simpson because in the court of public opinion, he is guilty as charged. even if a california jury walked him and i want to note that that espn documentary that o.j. made in america, we heard members of that jury say that that acquittal was retribution for the rodney king acquittal is. so think what that public is
have you decided, has the estate decided whether they are going to take any additional action to try and secure any of the millions? craig, the estate has never taken any action except for like a month after the civil judgment was entered. we executed for the estate on rocking ham all of simpson s personal property, seized it at that time and insured it with the goldman debt where it went to auction. but beyond that, we ve never taken any affirmative steps to pursue anything. it s basically, you know, the view of the estate is the beneficiaries are the children and there s no need to prolong the public misery. as i ve said the voice of nichole was to show who murdered her and now worrying about the children going forward. no more pursuit. katy, to be clear, in terms of assets and and what theoretically could even be gotten from o.j. simpson, he has
he s probably going to seek some female attention. and then probably go back and work on his golf game, but i don t see him doing much that s going to be involved with him trying to generate any income because he s pretty well set as far as i know with all the pensions that he just discussed. carl, when you said he s going to seek female attention, you mean that o.j. is on the proul? i don t know about that necessarily on the proul, but he has been someone who was crat incarcerated for nine years, and i m sure that he still has interest in females. okay. all right. carl douglas. carl, do stand by for me. if you can. are you still with me, carl? yes, i am. okay. do stand by for me one second. i want to come back here before that conversation goes off the rails. coming back to these assets, i just want to make sure we have we know of everything in the
person. we re going to have to let that be the last bill. thank you. john q. kelly appreciate your time. a big thanks to all of our guests who have joined us here this afternoon. again, o.j. simpson, 70 years old. he spent the last nine years in prison in nevada. word coming down a short time ago that he has been paroled. we will get back now to the other news of the day and with that we turn to chris. hey, this is the big news of the day. and here is a man, o.j. simpson, to answer your question who had not just extraordinary and anyone who was around that time or seen the films knows what an extraordinary athlete he was. but you could see it today. there is something about o.j. simpson and his personality that drew people in and continues to today. hello, everyone. i am chris jansing in for ali very well shee. o.j. simpson is going to be a free mab once again. that nevada parole board deciding that the 70-year-old former superstar should be out of jail after serve sg nine
ruined so many lives of young black men and women that it needs to be so, yes, to date, in answer to your question, no, i think that the racism that we kind of railed against then is still existing now and how i feel about o.j.? i m glad that a person is free, that a person is free. and i think it was a fair hearing. it was justified. he s paid nine years. and nine years in prison is a long time. and on the numbers, because you make an important point, craig. we have the numbers. we pulled them. when polled in 1995, 23% of respondent s believed he was innocent. when polled last year, revisiting the question, 7% of respondent s believed he was innocent. so while the racial divide was clear at the time, i think that shifted. one other point do we have time? yes. one other point. the trial as we know back when it first occurred on the double homicide positioned it as asking people to choose between whether there was systemic racism within