s flow to be with the families. he showed full support to the muslim community in christchurch. this is not new zealand. the only part of the incident and actions that we have seen in the past 24, 36 hours, that is new zealand, is the support you re seeing now. but nothing that led up to it is who we are or is who this city is. this act of terror was brought to our shores and rained down upon us here. while, perhaps, that nightmare will never be over for cous cause dozens of families who have gun laws. you know, in my reporting
post-9/11 trauma. i m guessing she is anxious for a different photograph to be in the public realm of her at some point. jackie, how does it feel for you to witness this story, to think about it, to write about it? for myself like a lot of people, it s a real sense of deja vu. as a congressional reporter for wall street journal, i covered the clarence thomas/anita hill hearings in 1991. and it was nothing short of a searing experience. and i ve many times since then said to people when i ve been asked to speak on journalism, on panels or at a lectern, i say it was the single most troubling experience of my reporting career because it was so it was the only time that my personal feelings were so close to the surface there because i was so appalled by the way she was treated.
said to people when i ve been asked to speak on journalism, on panels or at a lectern, i say it was the single most troubling experience of my reporting career because it was so it was the only time that my personal feelings were so close to the surface there because i was so appalled by the way she was treated. again, like doctor in this affair, anita hill was a very professional respected woman. she was younger at the time, and she had worked with clarence thomas at two different federal agencies. but to see her, the patronizing tone, i was sitting through the hearings which actually were only three days. and at one point finally the republican senator started questioning her in a way that was very patronizing and saying that they believed that she believed what she was saying, but could she be fantasizing
alto. she teaches in conjunction with stan ford. and notably has co-written more than 50 scientific books and publications, some of topics child abuse, adult depression, post-9/11 trauma. i m guessing she is anxious for a different photograph to be in the public realm of her at some point. jackie, how does it feel for you to witness this story, to think about it, to write about it? for myself like a lot of people, it s a real sense of deja vu. as a congressional reporter for wall street journal, i covered the clarence thomas/anita hill hearings in 1991. and it was nothing short of a searing experience. and i ve many times since then said to people when i ve been asked to speak on journalism, on panels or at a lectern, i say it was the single most troubling experience of my reporting career because it was so it was the only time that my personal feelings were so close to the surface there because i was so appalled by the way she was treated. again, like doctor in this affair, anit
published because survivors fought for it. i m joined now by a man who s helping with that fight, attorney david insco. he represents four survivors of abuse, including a man named todd fray who petitioned the supreme court to get the documents published. david, thank you for joining me. the scope of this is remarkable. i guess what i m struck by is for the entirety of my reporting career, i have reported on these sorts of stories. i remember before i was a reporter hearing about them. we ve at least been hearing about this for 30 or 40 years. how is it possible that this grand jury report talks about things that have happened in the last decade on the scale that it s still happening? it s simply shocking, ali. this report categorizes abuse that s taken place for more than half a century in the commonwealth of pennsylvania. and the active cover-up of it by the hierarchy of the church.