simply ignored trey gowdy s letter and had an assistant to the president, named mark short, write a reply letter to trey gowdy last week that completely ignores the questions about rob porter. so we still don t know what john kelly knew and when he knew it. the top democrat on the committee, elijah cummings has asked to subpoena the white house for the answers that john kelly is refusing to give. the rob porter scandal has once again exposed john kelly to what has become his greatest challenge as white house chief of staff. when he was caught telling a false story about congressman wilson and president obama, he didn t apologize to them or the country for lying to them. so it s consistent that he has not apologized to jenny willoughby for not taking her story seriously. john kelly has not apologized to
e.p.a. has been doing practice. we filed a request asking for what everybody else in the executive branch did. our bottom line is that we believe transparency and openness in government. we pay for these records. we would li to know what our elected officials, whether it is this administration or previous, if they see the list. they talk transparency. let s see if they produce it. if they are watching tonight, they will provide with tha.p. reqst. congressman accusing eric holder of havsomething to gh. he is not happy with the reply letter. in that letter, attorney general holder s testimony with surveillance. chairman goodlat wants answers directly fromorney general holder. he said he didn t know anything about any potential investigations or prosecutions of res a that turned out not to be so. you had james rosen here at fox
president? well, in the first question, we have a constitutional right to have it as a matter of oversight. yes. on the second question, i guess i do have some questions about the constitutionality of the president s authority, but i m not going to make that final determination until i read the memos and the papers that come from the office of legal counsel, the department of justice. greta: but senator, if it s not going to be forthcoming, it s information f you ve previously requested it, in the fall of 2011, and if senator leahy, a democrat has previously requested it in the fall of 2011, and i suspect you never even got did you ever get a reply letter, a response to your letters? we got the same information in a private briefing that came out in the in the release that that was called a white paper that came out on monday or tuesday, which isn t isn t the information we want. that just kind of tells about
well, in the first question, we have a constitutional right to have it as a matter of oversight. yes. on the second question, i guess i do have some questions about the constitutionality of the president s authority, but i m not going to make that final determination until i read the memos and the papers that come from the office of legal counsel, the department of justice. greta: but senator, if it s not going to be forthcoming, it s information f you ve previously requested it, in the fall of 2011, and if senator leahy, a democrat has previously requested it in the fall of 2011, and i suspect you never even got did you ever get a reply letter, a response to your letters? we got the same information in a private briefing that came out in the in the release that that was called a white paper that came out on monday or tuesday, which isn t isn t the information we want. that just kind of tells about