one health center left in missouri, and women have to travel hundreds of miles, making repeat trips, getting child care, time off of work, just to obtain a medical procedure. and the people who are affected the most by these terrible laws that are closing down our health centers, they re women with low income, women who live in rural areas who are the most affected by these onerrous restrictions. at what point do you think the supreme court has to pick up these cases if it s your argument this is an excuse. this isn t about the paperwork or admitting privileges of these things. if the result is to eliminate all abortion in the state, does that itself in your view violate roe v. wade? absolutely, which is the reason why we are suing the state of missouri. what they re doing is unconstitutional, it is illegal, it s dangerous, and it s part of a trend that we re seeing across the country with anti-women s
phoenix international airport, it will be tested in boston as well later this month. of the ct scanners made by different companies are also likely to be tested later in the year, the technology is similar to what we currently use to inspect checked luggage, they tend to send hundreds of images to an x-ray camera, giving screeners a 3d picture of a carry-on bag and its contents, using algorithms to detect explosives, firearms, and other prohibited items. it could speed up the screening by reducing or even eliminating the need for repeat trips through the x-ray machine and the secondary screens we are all familiar with. currently, we have to remove laptops from bags for screening, now this comes in the wake of the u.s. of banning in carry-on luggage is on flights
motivation, six hours including two days missing time off from work. the expense amounts to just over $65. abc news chronicled dmv trips from hell. facing long drives, long lines in government offices, repeat trips to the dmv, more document gathering, more waiting. it does seem that pennsylvania republicans would rather not have headlines like that one. last month they won a round in state court when a lower court judge upheld the law. the next day 93-year-old got her id. the state gave her the id anyway. they made an exception for her after her case got a ton of publicity. a state official told a reporter tagging along for her id adventure that other voters
in government offices, repeat trips to the dmv, more document gathering, more waiting. it does seem that pennsylvania republicans would rather not have headlines like that one. last month they won a round in state court when a lower court judge upheld the law. the next day 93-year-old got her id. the state gave her the id anyway. they made an exception for her after her case got a ton of publicity. a state official told a reporter tagging along for her id adventure that other voters could always try it. they could present whatever documents they do have, and try to persuade a collect to help them too, might work. pennsylvania is promising ahead of the election that no one legally entitled to vote will be denied the right to do so. but just try persuading the clerk to give you an eye id that
abc news chronicled dmv trips from hell. facing long drives, long lines in government offices, repeat trips to the dmv, more document gathering, more waiting. it does seem that pennsylvania republicans would rather not have headlines like that one. last month they won a round in state court when a lower court judge upheld the law. the next day 93-year-old got her id. the state gave her the id anyway. they made an exception for her after her case got a ton of publicity. a state official told a reporter tagging along for her id adventure that other voters could always try it. they could present whatever documents they do have, and try to persuade a collect to help