him. then it would not matter at all. you would see schwartzman, a titan of industry, sit next to president trump in the white house as the president would spout lies about the economy. it doesn t matter. i remember interviews with senior campaign advisers about economics during the campaign. i remember being on the phone thinking, you guys are just make things up. and it didn t matter. i believe brendan is referring to an act known as the full ma nunchen. acording to political, mueller s team said that papadopoulos plea was only a small part of a larger-scale investigation. yet sarah huckabee sanders repeat lid was saying at the podium yesterday this thing is coming to a close, it s almost over. that s not likely. just based open the fact that we know or it s pretty obvious papadopoulos is going to be cooperate, that s why the investigation was kept secret. also we re probably going to see my prediction is we re going to see manafort and gates
lo baloney they ve been pedaling for years. it s been debunked repeat lid and will continue to be debunkt. all right, calling it belonnie. has it been debunked a few time, ken? what s been debunked is this idea we ve given control of u.s. uranium to the russians. the uranium is still in the united states. it can t be exported. what s at issue is that while these transactions were going on, the canadian interests involved contributed $2 million to the clinton foundation. bill clinton went to moscow and made a speech and was paid half a million dollars by one of the investment banks involved in the deal. the issue, though, is that there s no evidence that hillary clinton played any role in the decision by the u.s. government to let this sale go forward. yes, the state department played a role and somebody in the state department made a decision. but there s no evidence that it
the senator has tried repeat lid to color me and my associates as profiteers. i have refuted the charges with specifics many, many times. i really could not hear all that clearly because of technical problems. let me say this. let the evidence speak for itself. i think there is clearly i cant hear what he s saying. the institutional statement that clearly this isn t the way to transact the business. there are no checks and baltss, no accounting. good people and policy get in trouble. we heard it through the testimony of oliver north today. there was no accounting whatsoever. he was relying on hakeem, seacourt and others and i don t think they were well served. you used a specific in terms of saying he made a profit of more than 40% on one transaction.
president use their loyalty it sends a message to his party, you weren t with me here. but what s also interesting is he didn t actually call out any one specifically. which is definitely something we ve seen the president do in the past. it was a shot across the bow, but certainly not one we know the president is capable of, to people who cross him. tal to your point about the republicans having to represent their constituents, we heard from one of those representative dave joyce, who had repeat lid voted to repeal obamacare. back when that vote really didn t count because obama was in the white house, but he wrote in a statement saying my prior votes to repeal all or parts of obamacare underscore what i have long argued, we need a better health care system. after listening to medical care professional is came to the conclusion the medical health care act was not a better solution so i m curious, athena, if it would have mattered if the president had maybe shifted in the way he was
they said help us knock down this story. they asked for a very political thing there. and if you step back away from this, wolf, you have to ask yourself the question. if there s no there there, a the white house has repeat lid claimed and shown to be wrong, michael flynn was only calling the ambassador to wish him a merry christmas and that turns out to be false, in a long line of falsehoods, if in fact the white house is correct and that there was no contact with russians and there is just nothing to see there, they should be out in front saying, let s do this investigation, let s show everything, let s get the documents out, let s move on so we can start talking about infrastructure. but of course they re acting in exactly the opposite way. they re doing everything they can to dee legitimatize the study to say that the truth doesn t matter and continuing to be dishonest about it. that is not the activities of a group of people who, in fact, don t have anything to hide. should the