climb arguing that this was in the scope of his duties as president. it s worth noting that cords to concern this removal provision quite frankly. i think meadows has a 50/50 shot i think trump has something less than that. what happens with one is not gonna dictate what happens with the other. let s go back to caitlin in that clementa. kaitlan? joining me now is john bolton someone who worked with trump, with his former white house national security adviser. ambassador, thank you for being here with us tonight. as someone who worked inside the west wing with donald trump, when he was president, what is it like to see as mugshot tonight? well, i thought it was, as most things trump does carefully stage. they must of thought about what looks he wanted. he could ve smile, but i, is that he looks like a thug. i think it is intended to be a sign of intimidation against the prosecutors and judges.
an uphill climb arguing this was in my scope as duties as president. it s worth noting the federal governments do tend to construe this removal provision quite broadly. i think meadows has a 50/50 shot. i think trump has something less than that. but what happens with one is not going to dictate what happens with the other. let s go back to kaitlan in atlanta. kaitlan? reporter: yeah, and joining me now is john bolton, someone who worked with trump, was his former white house national security adviser. ambassador, thank you for being here tonight. i just wonder, as someone who worked inside the west wing when donald trump was president, what is it like for you to see his mug shot tonight? i thought it was carefully staged. they must have thought about what look they wanted. he could have smiled. he could have looked benign. instead, he looks like a thug. and i think it s intended to be a sign of intimidation against the prosecutors and judges. that s what they picked, and
Voting advocacy groups sued Arizona to block a new law that could criminalize volunteers or organizations who provide registration or voter assistance to individuals registered to vote outside the state
they did know. i mean, you can t just make things up. the argument that the removal provision in the impeachment article was somehow brand new, that is the exact same language that republicans crafted in the clinton impeachment. i mean, they just made things up and it was sad. i mean, i m not sure how you deal with that, but i m curious, it does kind of i can t even xri behi comprehend behind that sort of thing when you have the facts laid out so specifically. but when you speak to any of those colleagues who make statements like that after the fact when there are no cameras around, is there any sort of admission of what they are doing is being just politically charged, that it is just for grand standing, or to make political points? you know, right after the vote, i headed for the airport