erased terms in the statute and rewrote it joining the obama administration. that was wrong. that s why i reluctantly called for a constitutional amendment for periodic judicial retention elections. bring up donald trump. you ve defended him. your former governor rick perry has criticized him. you ve had an experience with plenty of mexican immigrants in texas. are these immigrants that are coming in texas, what donald trumps describes, are they drug dealers rapists and such? listen. i am a passionate advocate for legal immigrants. i am the son of an immigrant who came legally from cuba and i ll tell you, from the day i started campaigning i traveled the state of texas talking about how all of us we are the children of those who risks everything for freedom. that that immigrant experience of all of us is what makes us americans, because we value in our dna liberty and opportunity above all else. now when it comes to donald
following their judicial oaths and taking the role of policymakers and legislators rather than being judges. you want to go another step further. you want to make them part of the political process. you want o have them deal in retention elections. doesn t that politicize the court more? any state that has elections for judges, they re raising money, it s it weakens the judiciary branch. does it not? it is the justices who have politicized the court. they are the ones who have stepped in to try to resolve every policy matter. they shouldn t be rewriting obamacare. chief justice roberts famously used the analogy of an umpire calling balls and strikes. they stopped being an umpire. they became a player on a team. they put on an obama jersey they got out the eraser, they erased terms in the statute and rewrote it joining the obama administration. that was wrong. that s why i reluctantly called for a constitutional amendment for periodic judicial retention elections. bring up donal
further. you want to make them part of the political process. you want o have them deal in retention elections. doesn t that politicize the court more? any state that has elections for judges, they re raising money, it s it weakens the judiciary branch. does it not? it is the justices who have politicized the court. they are the ones who have stepped in to try to resolve every policy matter. they shouldn t be rewriting obamacare. chief justice roberts famously used the analogy of an umpire calling balls and strikes. they stopped being an umpire. they became a player on a team. they put on an obama jersey, they got out the eraser, they erased terms in the statute and rewrote it joining the obama administration. that was wrong. that s why i reluctantly called for a constitutional amendment for periodic judicial retention elections. bring up donald trump. you ve defended him. your former governor rick perry has criticized him. you ve had an experience with plenty of mexican immigran