straightforward outside of how to handle the classified information itself. so there s that case very slow, and this case about january 6th and the former president s role in it, it is now one of the most important pieces in it whether or not trump has immunity for any of his actions because he was the sitting president at the time of the attack. that s actually been kicked up the supreme court, and that too could drag on for a bit of time because one possibility the court rather than saying whether or not trump is immune because of his behavior or making any ruling that would allow the case to move forward, the court could say instead, you know what, we re kicking this back down to the district court level. judgert tanya chutkan, overseei the case we want her to decide what shewa thinks was in the sce of trump s power as president, and that could get relitigated and appealed and come back to us for months and months and also pushing that beyond election day. however, these are still t
two after the rape and, you know, the jury found, and trump refused to show up to rebut that she was raped that day. and so, he is precluded, there is a doctrine called collateral law that if you lose an issue once to a party, you can t relitigated. so basically, e. jean carroll s lawyers are saying, they made a motion to exclude all sorts of things that he want, or that he might try to do to relitigate. it also, to make sure that trump does not pull the kind of crap that he pulled the other day in court across the street. the new republican has reported it speaks just to that. so, they write that caplan issued an order to say barring trump s lawyers from discussing carols twice of lawyer, who might be paying her legal fees. they can make comments concerning her past romantic relationships, sexual disposition, and he can t claim he didn t sexually abuse her. but there is something that they can claim.
white house and they have said that s to get trump. he s talked about not being allowed to not participate in closing arguments. he s characterizing this as a refusal from the judge. cnn has obtained documents and the judge was open to allowing him to preparing in closing arguments, but the judge wanted some guardrails, some restrictions. there s good reason for that. during the proceedings trump has attacked the judge, the district attorney, members of the court staff. the judge said, i would let you participate in closing arguments, but we have some restrictions. you have to stick to the facts and not attack your accusers. his lawyer said it was not tenable and the judge closed the door on this possibility. i expect this will be relitigated. i think this will come up again and trump pointing to the attorney general s campaign promise to prosecute him and
the politics behind it. tim is better than that answer, but here we are. donald trump brings people down to his level and the problem is none of them want to rise to a new level. just for context, the inside joke, we were talking about babies in the corner, that s why they were laughing and pointing. there wasn t much more to it than that. why are they laughing and pointing at each other. i want to talk about something. since the former president tweeted or whatever he did on truth social, this alleged report he s going to produce that is going to definitively prove fraud in georgia despite the fact that there were multiple audits that every single vote was recounted. the fact that this has been relitigated over and over again both in court and the state level in every single time he s been proven to lie. my question, this is important.
willis or whoever is going to be the lead attorney, will make what s called the motion, where the attorneys seek to disallow evidence or allow evidence. both those prosecutors are going to make motions that this 2020 election cannot be relitigated in either trial. it is irrelevant, it is a red herring. it will be up to judge chutkan and whoever the judge is in georgia. it is completely irrelevant. it will be interesting whatever his report is he s releasing and if his name is on it because he is a criminal defendant and he has a right to remain silent, so any false information in that report, i m not saying there will be but it will be used against him. in all of his cases. so, but that relitigating the 2020 election is good for the public, but it won t happen in the courtroom. and vaughn, bring us up to date. i understand there is a statement from the attorney for one of the so-called fake electors in georgia, david