Want to hear from you on what you believe the president s influence and legacy will be on Foreign Affairs issues. Efforts against isis, syria, the Iran Nuclear Deal may be other topics you want to engage in on the president s influence. Here is how you you can let us know. 202 7488000, democrats. 202 7488001, republicans. 202 7488002, independent colors. Tweak us or go to our facebook page. A recent piece in the washington about the president s Foreign Affairs talks about the use of restraint that the president has seen over the last eight years. Madeites this mr. Obama it clear that restraint was his primary choice. The result was that those who wish america may have had little incentive not to defy it. Exhibit number one for the critics was the president s failure to enforce his own redline in syria a failure that contributed to a perception of weakness. Yet it is simplistic to assign blame for all the worlds ills to obamas restraint. A moreot clear that aggressive policy would have
Conversation in washington with peter kornbluh, julia sweig and jorge dom ingvar easy. He is mainly a symbol as you put it of the 20th century. But the one pit of impact he continued to have is as a resistor. Very much as you introduced him, as someone who did not look at all well upon president obamas visit to havana in march of 2016 who immediate loor after obama left criticized it in public, something he had really not done while his brother raul had been president. And he became the not only the symbol but the practical leader of the attempt to contain the possible impact of the obama policy change inside cuba. We conclude with ben rhodes, Deputy National security advisor. The degree to which we are per pit waiting the conflict with cuba, stirring the pot with cuba, fighting battles with cuba, that only supports hardliners in cuba who reject any opening to the United States. What we said is we want to put the conflict in the past. We want to look forward that is in our interest. If
Conversation in washington with peter kornbluh, julia sweig and jorge dom ingvar easy. He is mainly a symbol as you put it of the 20th century. But the one pit of impact he continued to have is as a resistor. Very much as you introduced him, as someone who did not look at all well upon president obamas visit to havana in march of 2016 who immediate loor after obama left criticized it in public, something he had really not done while his brother raul had been president. And he became the not only the symbol but the practical leader of the attempt to contain the possible impact of the obama policy change inside cuba. We conclude with ben rhodes, Deputy National security advisor. The degree to which we are per pit waiting the conflict with cuba, stirring the pot with cuba, fighting battles with cuba, that only supports hardliners in cuba who reject any opening to the United States. What we said is we want to put the conflict in the past. We want to look forward that is in our interest. If
Republican, we want to hear from you for the next 45 minutes. When you hear stories about Division Within your party on whether or not to support donald trump, what is your reaction . And should the r. N. C. Cut its ties with the Trump Campaign . For republicans only, here are the numbers, 2027488000. For those of you who support donald trump in the november 8 election. For those in the Republican Party not supporting donald trump, the number to call is 2027488001. If youre undecided, 2027488002. Also share on social media, send us a tweet, cspanwj, or join us on facebook. Good morning. Thank you very much for being with us on a busy day. Later well also talk about the situation in milwaukee. More racial unrest. A Police Shooting with an armed gunman, well have more details on that in our 9 30 east coast time hour. First this morning, front page of the Washington Post with this headline, millennial voters see 2016 as a bad joke. Let me share with you a portion of what they write about
Thats justified or proportional. What i would like to see here in washington is a kind of middle ground. I think that we as americans should be unequivocal in our condemnation of the coup, that this was an attempted military coup against a democratically elected government. Yes, it might be a problematic government. Yes, it might be a government that has authoritarian tendencies, and we should but at the same time we have to respect democratic outcomes, so that should be one part of our position. On the other hand, that doesnt mean that that we should and im uncomfortable with the idea that anyone who criticizeds erdogan in the postcoup context is, therefore, being sympathetic to the coup. There should be a middle ground where you can be critical of the coup but also critical of any overreach from president erdogan. So now just in my last couple of minutes i think that theres a for me as someone who thinks a lot about erdogans personal motivations and what drives him, how many is relig