dust, a man whose words are a death trap to america, electoral college sanctioned hate speech contaminating this national anthem. i m not as nasty as confederate flags being tattooed across my city, maybe the south actually is going to rise again maybe for some it never really fell. blacks are still in shackled and grave just for being black, slavery has been reinterpreted as the prison system in front of people who see melanin as animal skin. i am not as nasty as a swastika painted on a pride flag. and i didn t know devils could be resurrected, but i feel hitler in these streets. a mustache traded for a toupee.
horrible if there is actually stuff in the e-mails. but image there isn t any the damage is already done. precisely because it revives the memories in the clintons and 90 s especially for saturday night live with a young audience it is telling them for the first time this is who the clintons are. anybody who remembers the 90d know they parsed and skimmed and reinterpreted words. it could be it was illegal or skirting the rules or with a it wasn t. it raises the question do you want to this baggage around for the next four years or eight years? in other news the republican letter to iran fuelling democratic outrage this morning. does it undermine president obama s attempts to make a deal? senate lawmakers say no but
persuade first the public and then ultimately the courts that in fact a second amendment gives you an individual right to a gun. that is the way it is being talked about now and played out in the courts and on the streets. why is the teller case, the gun law case at the supreme court so critical in the way it is interpreted and reinterpreted? it s a realing interesting thing. the united states supreme court never ruled that the second amendment gives you an individual right to a gun until 2008. it was really recent. it was they actually ruled overwise several times before that. so that was the heller case as it s called. and now playing out in courtrooms all across the country, people are testing and saying, what does this mean? supreme court said you have an individual right to a gun but there can be limits just as there are with any right. and we as a society also have the right to safety.
visitor visas to women who are clearly not coming here solely to see the washington monument, for example, and we need to either amend the 14th amendment or first statutorily change it or have them figure out the interpretation. you know you ll get blowback from groups that claim everything from racism to anything else. so give me your best defense about why the 14th amendment should be reinterpreted. look, this particular clause of the 14th amendment was hastily drafted by a reconstruction congress that never could have anticipated hundreds of millions of people on the move every day. the current interpretation is defeating the operation of u.s. immigration and entry controls. we are being taken advantage of, snookerred, now 350,000 children are born here to mothers here who are illegal aliens, that s the size of the city of st. louis. this is like waking up and finding an additional 10 people living in your house that you didn t expect all of a sudden and we re being taken advant
video. she s not kidding. we have a screen where we can see andy. he was ooing. there it is. it is reinterpreted. that is the cutest thing ever. amazing. i completely lost myself. we will close things out with a post game wrap up from tv s sad andy levy. to see clips of recent shows go to foxnews.com/redeye.