the congress that cipollone thought the trump was in danger of getting indicted for every crime in the book. if you want to know how serious this is, i think we can just take a look lawrence at donald trump s reaction to the thought that his top lawyer is going and testifying before congress tomorrow. trump issued a statement that really was kind of a rare soft touch. this is totally not trumpian. it didn t undermine cipollone s credibility, he didn t call him sully names like whatever donald trump would normally do. that s trump think that he does when he scared. with cipollone, he is terrified. so what he is doing is kind of buttering up cipollone and talking about privilege and this is not hoping cipollone will assert executive privilege, assert attorney client privilege and as you say, there s not a with of privilege
about this stuff. this was a sure loser and every court where privileges asserted and will be an incredibly waste of time and incredibly damaging to the law firm the mr. law cipollone not to tell truth. tomorrow years with donald trump said in his written statement. i don t normally bernie audience with trump statements but this was interesting for a number of reasons. he says, why would a future president of the united states have to have candid and important conversations with his white house counsel if he thought there was even a small chance that this person, essentially acting as a lawyer for the country, may someday be brought before a partisan and openly hostile committee in congress, or even a fair reasonable committee, to reveal the inner secrets of foreign policy or other important matters so bad for the usa! exclamation point. any less so striking because i guess the watergate hearings were in the early years of
and academics sounding. for what actually is at stake. the united states will no longer be united. if pennsylvania republicans steal the pennsylvania presidential election in 2024. the united states itself is what is at stake. the word united will have no meaning if pennsylvania steals the presidential election. pennsylvania will not be reunited with its neighboring state of new york which will deliver at least 2 million more votes for the democratic candidate. republicans in pennsylvania led by the republican candidate, for president, are plotting, not just a crime against pennsylvania voters but a crime against the voters in every other state. republicans who have turned against donald trump, and trump supporting candidates, are generally described as anti trump. sometimes described as never
court, may be participating in what he called, a slow motion coup d état. the radical majority on the supreme court have agreed to hear a case that could allow state legislators to choose the electors for the electoral college, no matter which candidate gets the most votes in that state. pennsylvania is one of the states where that could happen. and the republican nominee for governor wants it to happen. the republican nominee for governor state senator doug mastriano, was plotting with rudy giuliani, to try to figure out how to give donald trump pennsylvania s electoral votes, last time even though joe biden won the most votes in pennsylvania. it was legally impossible to do. now there was some falsely alarmist written analysis at the time, and some publications, suggesting that the pennsylvania legislator could do that. but that analysis was always totally wrong about pennsylvania, in 2016. because at the time, the pennsylvania legislator would have had to quickly pass a law
trump s reaction to the thought that his top lawyer is going and testifying before congress tomorrow. trump issued a statement that really was kind of a rare soft touch. this is totally not trumpian. i mean he didn t undermine cipollone s credibility, he didn t call him silly names like phony cippollone or whatever donald trump would normally do. that s trump think that he does when he scared. with cipollone, he is terrified. so what he is doing is kind of buttering up cipollone and talking about privilege and hoping cipollone will assert executive privilege, assert attorney client privilege and as you say, there s not a wiff of privilege about this stuff. this was a sure loser and every court where privileges asserted and will be an incredibly waste of time and incredibly damaging to the law firm if mr cipollone