going enforce it the way i m interpreting it. it s because of gridlock. is that what our founders intended, though? there s a difference in saying that i think this element of the law is unconstitutional, i m not going to sign it and signing obama care only to discover that there are problems with it and then you decide without congressional action that you re going to unilaterally not enforce provisions. so there s a difference and you can t go to court because you don t have standing. we were discussing this very interesting hearing on the hill this week. a number of the elected members said because of current legal precedent they don t have standing. they don t have a way as a plaintiff to go to court and say they want to sue the executive court over these issues. senator bayh, you talked about something during this hearing, which is why the regulatory branchs and jonathan turley, said it s also like the rise of