Esfrain, the first place, Alireza Babaei from tehran. 2nd place and 3rd place melika hajilo from tehran in experimental science group, parham mostafavi from isfahan, Mohammad Qanei of yazd and ava shahriari from tehran in Foreign Languages group , mehrdad oliyae, 1st place, alireza karmi, 2nd place, asans frames, 3rd place in art group, 1st place, pouyan jamili rank two farzad dehghan benadaki and rank 3 Fatemeh Jafari nadushan, the head of radio and television, said that the National Media provides the capacity and the opportunity to be seen in what ways that comply with the rules and laws of the society. The programs also spoke about us, the people witnessed that we proved that we dont need 56 and 90 and obstinate faces and we actually continued our programs with faces that happened to be very popular. This is not our temporary policy. Really, in one moment with someone else, that is one of the headlines we are committed to the program of the transformation of the radio and tel
The last fewave minutes of this and take you live to washington or the role of congress in renegotiating the north American Free trade agreement. This is from John Hopkins School of international studies. [captions Copyright National cable satellite corp. 2017] [captioning performed by the national captioning institute, which is responsible for its caption content and accuracy. Visit ncicap. Org] nafta is significant because it is a copy hats of trade agreement comprehensive trade agreement and it is this template and model for the the unitednt that states negotiated, and it served as a template for certain provisions and bilateral trade negotiations. As soon as this year, congress will decide on what legislation to consider and amend on nafta. The will also consider ramifications of negotiating or withdrawn from nafta and how it would affect the u. S. Economy and Foreign Relations with partners, mexico and canada. Ande concerned Economic Leadership in the region, seat as a wherewithal
Good afternoon. Welcome. Thank you for joining us here today im a master of arts student here at Johns Hopkins university them north american freed trade agreement, or nafta, entered into on january, 11994. The agreement was signed by president george bush on december 17 of 1992 and approved by congress november 10 of 1994. Excuse me 1993. Nafta significant is because it was the most comp presentsive Free Trade Agreement negotiated at the time and contained several Ground Breaking prognoses. The new generation of Free Trade Agreement and also served as a template for certain provisions in multilateral trade negotiations as part this Year Congress will decide on what legislation to consider and to amend on the current nafta. There the will also consider the ramification offices negotiate organize withdrawing from na to how it will effect in the u. S. Economy and Foreign Relations with mexico and canada. Some contend that will draw from the tpp could damage u. S. Economic leadership and
Us. The other imminent threat is giving up a piece of the grid. And giving Law Enforcement the tools of intelligence, the single greatest asset we need have and also giving them the electronic tools, i dont think we do nearly the job we should be doing in terms of protecting against cyber attacks. Weve seen just last week what happens when supposedly the chinese have now hacked into the personnel records of upwards of 20 million government employees. The one positive out of all of that, it is the only hope we have of maybe recovering lois lerners emails from the i. R. S. , get them from the chinese. But it is a serious issue that we need to put first and foremost as a serious threat to the safety and security of our communities. I know that there are some sheriffs representing interesting states, maybe like iowa, might have interests there. Some other states like florida. I see one of those sheriffs is about to take the stage and id like to ask him to take the next question. Governor i
Care act. Is that a fair criticism . I think in part it is and in part it isnt. Im not sure that it is the dissents right to say that the court had to strain to create ambiguity here anymore than it does in a range of cases that get far less attention. Is it more of a strain to find ambiguity than it did in yates . That im skeptical. Other than the intensity of the spotlight im not sure the court had to work harder to find ambiguity than in any number of cases where it resolves hard questions. I think it is fair to say that whether or not the chief justice or Justice Kennedy thought this was ambiguous, they thought it was a drafting error. Its fair to say in other contexts the court has been less hospitable to that. Im not worried about how we come out because maybe it is mistake and congress can fix it. That argument has a lot more sway in other contexts than it had here because in most contexts its a useful and benign fiction. Here it would have seemed ridiculous. The last thing anyo