Is so much more that cspan does to make sure that people outside the way know what is going on inside it. I am proud to announce i am especially running for president of the United States. Politics,r who covers and for so many of my stories, cspan has been part of my research, providing you with insight about people. Makeshiftre so many within the blogosphere, and all these policy areas get covered. How many Nuclear Warheads does the Russian Federation had aimed at us . And do the decisionmaking. House meetings, senate meetings. Good morning, everyone. Phone lines are open. You never know what you are going to get. You are right and i am your mother, and i disagreed that all families are like ours. Thatnot know many families are fighting at thanksgiving. Live coverage of the 32nd annual miami book fair. Book tv. Caller caller becomes weekend cspan American History tv. Whether we are talking about a congressional hearing or an area of history there is so much information that you can co
President obama and ted cruz have defended natos role in keeping the world safe. Do you think nato is a good u. S. Investment . Republicans call in at 2027488001. Democrats, 2027488000. Independents, 2027488002. For those outside the u. S. , 2027488003. cspanwj and facebook. Com cspan. We are talking nato this morning. The u. S. Role in the 67yearold alliance. We are talking about the u. S. Contribution to nato which equates to 500 million a year, according to Defense Department budgets. Not role has become a concern on the campaign trail. This from the Washington Times this morning. Secretarygeneral Jens Stoletenberg said he welcomed more attention to nato and nato related issues in the u. S. Bit of Donald Trumps recent comments in the Washington Post editorial board. [video clip] donald trump i see nato as a good thing to have. I look at the ukraine situation ad i say, so, ukraine is country that affects us far less than it affects other countries and nato. Yet, we are doing all the
The supports of various kinds been contracted, and with the creation of large state armies, positionindeed, a re reprivatization. People that study agree this is privatization, and i concur. The independence refers to the decision in the 1990s to pull back from its promise to take care of its own, and, instead, emphasize, in many of its support programs, selfsufficiency, and that came through retooling programs like Family Support into family readiness, for example. Readiness and pulling back then on the amount of support often. It came through a new program called army family team building, which emphasized very much the responsibility of spouses and families to serve the military and know the military, rather than to have a army helping them, and through a variety of other things. I mean, today, i see the echoes of it in the emphasis on resilience, frankly. So, we can talk more about that, because i think we are running out of time, but i think it is a very important seeing in milita
Backdrop of significant civil rights advancement in the United States including the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Voting Rights act of 1965, ten years on the heels of brown versus board of education. So, what is the lesson we can draw . One is that the Immigration Law for the future in our current push for comprehensive Immigration Reform should also take that frame of a civil rights legislation which is the civil rights project of our time and will continue to be as long as we do not as long as we avoid addressing this problem of illicit mess and reality. Just a word or two to build on that. He has nicely framed this question of again. But, and i think it really is the key, but in terms of if its fair to call Immigration Law a civil rights issue, ii would argue absolutely, in light of the types of mechanisms that have been deployed by the state against foreignborn persons and there are clear parallels between the experience of africanamericans, latinos, and other disadvantaged grou
Or thousands of these request that same old this person and they cannot in good faith for coated must release them. And yet we still have more money going to i. C. E. , of officers whose unions are tied and that communities are risk. The simple question. So what happens if the person is reckless driving as the officer approaches to find out the individual is illegally in the country . What happens . That the town hall people say turn them over to the feds for deportation Security Officer say they will not even Pay Attention unless there is multiple offenses. That is absolutely the case. If he is doing his duty. Thats correct. But to protect those local citizens they will not come get them. Correct. How would you comment on this situation . Have you given any thought to that . I have. First, the code of federal regulation is very clear and says was the local Law Enforcement officer receives a dictator from i. C. E. They shall maintain custody for no more than 48 hours the is but there i