BY GILBERT P. BAYORAN UNIFED directors Atty. Edgardo Acuña, Joseph Edgar Sarrosa, Paul Azcona and Andre Corro (left to right) give updates on the TRO they
NO TO SUGAR IMPORTATION. Negros Occidental-based United Sugar Producers Federation directors (from left) Lawyer Edgardo Acuna, Joseph Edgar Sarrosa, Paul Azcona, and Andre Corro express opposition to what they call an "ill-timed" importation of 200,000 metric tons of refined sugar provided in Sugar Order No. 3 of the Sugar Regulatory Administration in a press conference at the UNIFED office in Bacolod City on Tuesday (Feb. 15, 2021). They announced the Regional Trial Court Branch 73 in Sagay City, Negros Occidental has issued a 20-day temporary restraining order against the sugar imports set to arrive starting March 1.(PNA photo by Nanette L. Guadalquiver) BACOLOD CITY - The Regional Trial Court (RTC) Branch 73 in Sagay City, Negros Occidental has issued a 20-day temporary restraining order (TRO) against the importation of 200,000 metric tons of refined sugar provided in Sugar Order No. 3 of the Sugar Regulatory Administration (SRA). The ruling stemmed from the civil case for
NO TO SUGAR IMPORTATION. Negros Occidental-based United Sugar Producers Federation directors (from left) Lawyer Edgardo Acuna, Joseph Edgar Sarrosa, Paul Azcona, and Andre Corro express opposition to what they call an "ill-timed" importation of 200,000 metric tons of refined sugar provided in Sugar Order No. 3 of the Sugar Regulatory Administration in a press conference at the UNIFED office in Bacolod City on Tuesday (Feb. 15, 2021). They announced the Regional Trial Court Branch 73 in Sagay City, Negros Occidental has issued a 20-day temporary restraining order against the sugar imports set to arrive starting March 1.(PNA photo by Nanette L. Guadalquiver) BACOLOD CITY - The Regional Trial Court (RTC) Branch 73 in Sagay City, Negros Occidental has issued a 20-day temporary restraining order (TRO) against the importation of 200,000 metric tons of refined sugar provided in Sugar Order No. 3 of the Sugar Regulatory Administration (SRA). The ruling stemmed from the civil case for