i m feeling much better. doctors told me i didn t suffer cognitive damage. okay. so the primary continued as planned with fetterman s name on the ballot and fetterman won. he became the democratic nominee. that was the last that most voters heard about john fetterman s stroke. for months, fetterman remained in semiseclusion. as the campaign progressed, the polls tightened, he had to venture. he had no choice. videos surfaced of fetterman speaking at rallies in what seemed a bizarre and highly disjointed way. some wondered if he d suffered, quote, no cognitive damage. they rushed forward to bring science to bear on this question. in clifford chen s considered opinion as a respected medical professional, who works at a major research university, john fetterman was absolutely fine. fetterman was, quote, recovering well from his stroke. he had, quote, no work restrictions and can work full duty in public office. in other words, john fetterman was as sharp and as healthy as you o
raa venue a place to spout off, but it s used in the information wars. this .is that correct? yes. absolutely a lot of talks about bots, promoting the latest cryptic scam. even bots of foreign intelligence agencies. the truths is our intelligence agency operates through cut-outs and ngos have played a huge role in influencing politics on every level precisely by gaming the system and social media platforms like twitter. and elon musk i think really needs someone who understands the architecture of that censorship. there s an example, probably the greatest national security leak since snowden how the regime works. on revolver news there s a piece
jesse: would she say communism, do you think? jessica: i m pretty sure she would and that she has said it. but the argument the white house is trying to make, and i agree with dana, obviously i m not a press secretary myself but the statement they put out this morning, tony blinken also commented on this to make sure everybody knew the cuban government is saying that the u.s. is fomenting this, that we have no role whatsoever in causing this uprising, and it is they are people who are upset with how the regime works. i think we have been forceful, we ve been allies to them, we are saying we support you in your cause, your desire for freedom, to live free of an authoritarian, and they come in many packages. they come in communist packages and putin-like packages now. they come in packages like an assad. so i don t see a problem with telling them that. lawrence: the problem is they ve neglected to talk about the why. you can t talk about people in
lot of intel. our intelligence channels seem to be the better ones. north korea is a dark spot for us. we don t know a lot about the way the regime works. this is an encouraging sign we saw last night but it s merely a handshake. i know you remember well the handshake on the white house lawn in 1993. what have we seen in the middle east since then. we have seen the second lebanon war. the north will still retain a nu nuclear arsenal. the president just said that prior administrations were played. he s got a point there. this any agreement if the oversight cheats it s going to look like the counter part was played. he is playing the same tools. the same instruments.
also go beyond that. the whole secret police who as we speak are probably beating people in dungeons. that s the way the regime works. that s the way it s always worked. and it s going to continue to work until mubarak goes. you re with the people? i m with the people. thank you. i am increasingly 100% for them. up next house republicans want to make it harder for women to get abortions. this is trouble making from what i can tell. i m going to listen to it. i m trying to figure it out. we have the law on the book, a woman s right to choose. we have the law on the books, no federal money for abortion. that s the status quo. why aren t we sticking with it? this is hardball only on msnbc.