ground there and what is this administration doing about it? not enough. if you look back at what this administration has done, we have struck regime assets in deescalation zones. we had an air to air shoot down against syrian jet. we bombed the red line situation twice. we killed over 100 russian mercenaries. there has been a lot of action but not enough. bill clinton says his biggest regret of his presidency was inaction in rwanda. i think president obama and at this point on track, president trump, are going to say that some of their biggest regrets is inaction in syria. half a million dead syrians. this has generated isis. this will generate isis too and i m not saying a full intervention by u.s. forces but i think we have to hold strong in that area and unfortunately i don t think we re doing enough. the president wants to sit down with vladimir putin later this summer, is this something he should address and demand action from? yeah, yeah. i have no problem with the
after this it s important to make sure it doesn t contaminate and doesn t effect sifcivil civ. they are doing that work there. we did hear that whatever happened it had to be bigger than what happened last year. what happened last year with the 59 missiles didn t stop assad. so they are talking about all of these attacks in damascus. i was told regime assets must be painful to the assad regime to the point that he understands that this will no longer be tolerated. i think that you heard the president and the others say the sustained nature of such an attack is to respond potentially more times when they used these chemical weapons in homes that they won t anymore. we are going to be going to nick walsh.
administration paid the iranians went into the hands of iran back to terrorists, the washington times reports the government traced the transferred you as cash back to terrorist groups including hezbollah as well as several rebel groups. the obama administration maintained the payments made two years ago was paid part of the settlement over irani and claims to regime assets used for an arms deal in a 70s. rob: a journalist calls for a professor to drown their all conservative students. is the ferrari responding to a post about teachers lowering conservative student grades tweeting they shouldn t do that. it is not right. they should hold the conservative students heads underwater until they stop breathing instead. he followed that with saying i m not joking about that part.
pocketbook. we will see what happens. that will be a sticking point. heather: $20 million for infrastructure funding and all through march 25th. thank you so much, appreciate it, lots of work, thank you. here is the question. that $1.7 billion the obama administration paid the iranians, guess where that went? into the hands of iran backed terrorists was the washington times reports the us government has traced some of the transfer of direct cashback to terrorist groups including hezbollah and several rebel groups lose the obama administration maintains the public made two years ago as part of a settlement over iranian claims to regime assets used for an arms deal in the 70s. another longtime aide to james comey retiring after 33 years. fox news confirming michael corbin is leaving his post as assistant director of public affairs. it was mentioned in a newly
the authorities took the bank over and froze $25 million of north korean regime assets, which is not a lot in the world of proliferation financing. when the six-party talks took place a year later under the bush administration, the one piece that the north koreans were insistent on was the lifting of financial measures against that bank. it affected them. it affected their ability to move transactions internationally. they really didn t like it. ultimately, it became part of the agreement. so i think they re susceptible and i think secretary of state tillerson made it clear in his statement at the u.n. security council on friday that the administration would purr sisue additional sanctions and want everybody along for the ride. are we overplaying how offensive or inappropriate it is for president trump to say he d be honored to meet with kim jong-un? are we splitting hairs here? is there an argument to be made, that he d be honored to represent the united states? i mean, he is in a v