than a lot of people thought because it was an internal review by the republican national committee. some people wanted them to do an outside review of what went wrong. they thought it was internal review it would not really tackle the major issues were problematic and gloss over them. what came out was a lot different than what people expected. they took on issues like gay marriage and immigration, calling for comprehensive immigration reform and not necessarily calling for gay marriage, but suggesting to win over americans who may be gay, you have to be open to ideas. you can t just, push those ideas away. so much bolder in testimony ways that and lot of people expected. jon: pandering to the anti-immigration crowd is the surest way to lose the next election, that is one of the conclusions? right. it says that you can t act hostile to immigrants or hispanic americans or have hostile rhetoric and expect them to vote for you. it may not be the number one issue for immigrant americans