and in those remarks you just saw, you heard chris christie raise the issue of abortion rights at the end. maybe this talk, maybe that s a signy fire that this talk was aimed at a republican audience. but other than that, aside about abortion rights, you can tell this is sort of a least partisan thing imaginable. whether you like chris christie as a candidate or not, whether you like him as a politician or not, his kind of skill at communicating the way you saw him communicate on an issue like this, that s why he still seems like he could be a contender despite all the numbers, everything on paper saying otherwise. that piece i just showed is the first half of his of these remarks that have these millions of views online. just watch the second part of it here. this is sort of the more personal part. this is i think that just as a political observer, this is pretty compelling no matter what you think of chris christie otherwise. watch. give you a second example. i m a recovering l
another example of the unreasonableness of his version. pistorius said he yelled for whoever was in there to call out and for reeva to call the police yet she never responds. if she s really in the bathroom using the toilet, you wouldn t expect her to be standing by the door and if she was and heard him, he was only nine feet away, you would expect her to respond. she went in there, locked herself in to get away from you because you were angry and she was afraid you would do something so she s trying to talk you down through the door and that s why she s standing up to want door when you fired the bullets into her body. let me ask you this, judge. in my mind as a recovering lawyer, it s a strong case for the prosecution, however, it s a circumstantial case. his story has so many holes in it and yet, the prosecution s case beyond a reasonable doubt at this point? i think it is because we re not dealing with a jury.
behalf. i think you got this problem. a journal that s written can be written anytime, you know? i m a recovering lawyer, but i do still remember that from when i practiced law. and why was she sending out all these tweets that have been preserved on the int ert net that said one thing, that was totally different from what she was saying, and then she comes back and says, well, i m hoping i put enough pressure, that he ll fold, and let me have my $127 million. anyway, it s a big charge there. big charge there. look, the attacks on this being partisan were coming full swing yesterday when it looked like it was the legislature legislators, the democrats. paul fishman, the u.s. attorney, is a democratic appointee. but he s highly respected. a more career guy. a cree guy. gone after democrats. put democrats he put menendez
modus operandi is i will try to do it the proper way but if i can t ten, yeah, i will rule by administrative law and also rule by executive order. we have seen is time and time again with immigration and healthcare and his response is if you don t like it sue me and we do. the biggest stimulus that the white house has brought is to lawyers and courts because he has kept them busy and they will be busy for decades trying to figure out and undo the bad that the president has done in overreaching his pow. laura: speaking as a recovering lawyer myself they don t need a stimulus for the most part. what would be bridge too far for him, though. even with the reelection which stunned a lot of republicans. we will win this with no problem, unemployment so high, we will win. what could he do that the american people say this is not what we voted nor for? a supercharged amnesty or some kind of supertax and all of the
modus operandi is i will try to do it the proper way but if i can t ten, yeah, i will rule by administrative law and also rule by executive order. we have seen is time and time again with immigration and healthcare and his response is if you don t like it sue me and we do. the biggest stimulus that the white house has brought is to lawyers and courts because he has kept them busy and they will be busy for decades trying to figure out and undo the bad that the president has done in overreaching his pow. laura: speaking as a recovering lawyer myself they don t need a stimulus for the most part. what would be bridge too far for him, though. even with the reelection which stunned a lot of republicans. we will win this with no problem, unemployment so high, we will win. what could he do that the american people say this is not what we voted nor for? a supercharged amnesty or some kind of supertax and all of the