themselves are more than e sufficient to justify the impeachment inquiry and probablt the conclusion that it is a hign crime and misdemeanor. and, mieke, because this intersects politics with eclaw, the expression from politics is, if you re explaining, you re losing. it would require them to go back and explain, to coin a term, the origins of their case on obstruction of justice, for example.ir yeah. look, i think there are many people who do think that in the mueller case there was ho obstruction.ca but what we have here in this case in ukraine is a very clear case of obstruction that is actually even worse because it is preventing the house from conducting oversight of the president into the specifics that are happening here. so when people like professor turley and the president s allies argue, look, we can t go forward on this because the rg firsthand witnesses haven t come forward, they neglect to mention that the president has barred those firsthand witnesses from coming for