economy eggs are not on there. this is something, i m not condoning it but condoning eggs and water balloons all the like is something that every teenage and college boy and peril has done. so he should definitely, if he is convicted and of course they have to prove that he did this first, but if he is convicted he needs to learn his lesson but deportation is out of the question. jon: all right, rebecca, first of all on the deportation question, do you agree? absolutely. jon: he would not face deportation? absolutely, jon. it is almost ridiculous that a crime like this, if this is even a crime, first of all, if it is even a felony. it s a felony in california if he created $400 or more of damage. who is to say that throwing eggs at someone s house even creates $400 in damage? jon: supposedly this venetian plaster on the exterior of the neighbor s house. 20,000 bucks worth of damage. so the neighbor says, yes. first we have to prove that it happened and that bieber was responsible
houseguest xavier smith, known as lil-za. while being booked he smashed the jail phone so they arrested him a second time on vandalism charges. with us rebecca rose woodland a trial attorney. they are talking, pillar, like justin bieber could be actually deported if convicted on these charges. he is after all a canadian citizen. is that likely. good morning, jon. no, don t deport the beebs. the good news for teenage fans in america bieber can not be deported. jon: why. although not a citizen, even convicted of a felony under our law he could have to commit a crime that is aggravated and eggs are not under that list. there is crime of moral turpitude but that means crimes that shock the conscious. good news for bieber and our
asking the judge to allow the judge to monitor twitter accounts and twitter handles of jurors, saying that their client deserves a fair trial. tom can any of, a criminal defense attorney and former prosecutor and jag attorney, rebecca rose woodland a trial attorney join us with more insight. this is really interesting area that is being opened up here. tom, i will start with you. twitter accounts, fair game of jurors? look, they re fair game in the sense that if the attorneys handling the case can do their own investigation and their own research and monitor the twitter accounts without invading the privacy of the potential jury panel i think that s legitimate. i am concerned with the idea that the judge would issue an order saying that the defense or prosecution or both are authorized to conduct ongoing monitoring of the potential panelists twitter accounts because i m afraid it would have chilling effect on jury selection not just on this case but all cases in the future.
expected to recover. in the meantime we are awaiting a verdict in the john edwards corruption trial. the former senator and presidential candidate is accused of misusing campaign donation money to hide an affair. a judge is hearing evidence to determine if two suspects will face trial in a brutal beating that left the man on your screen severely disabled. this is more than a year after san francisco giants fan bryan stow was attacked at dodger stadium in los angeles. jon: a federal judge issues a scathing verdict in the seaworld trainer death case. it stems from an incident two years ago in which a killer whale grabbed his trainer and drowned her after a live show. the judge slammed seaworld for putting its trainers at risk, recommends that barriers are used between the whales and the trainers to prevent another deadly incident. let s talk about it with rebecca rose woodland a trial attorney who joins us now. you say that for seaworld you