would come near to that kind of situation. well, comey s letter today states h s that he learned of t new e-mails yesterday and wrote the fbi cannot yet assess whether or not this material may be significant. i m joined by ari melber. ari, here s a gut question, the nut of the matter. is there any reason to believe there s any probative evidence that suggests hillary clinton did something wrong based on the statement by the fbi director? any reason to believe she s done something wrong or they see something wrong? no. there s nothing in the letter that says that. nothing. no, not in the letter and all the letter says is, hey, i told congress we were done reading e-mail when i testified under oath and that was true then, we were done. we have now legally lawfully obtained more e-mail and we re going to read it rather than not read it, which is a prudent investigative thing to do, but this close to an election needing to update your testimony sets off all these alarm bells.
i found it surprising that somebody as high ranking as the secretary of state is dealing with classified and sensitive information all the time, would think that it was okay to have a private server in your home where you put, you know, information and so forth, where you send e-mails. so how would you describe her handling her e-mails that way, in a word? well, i think it was sloppy and unprofessional. that it reflects a lack of understanding about how easy it is for adversaries to tap into communications, to get involved, for example, obviously in reading e-mail as we know is now very extensive. the chinese recently picked up the files of everybody who is currently working for the federal government. now, the situation, it strikes me maybe she went into it ignorant but i find that hard to believe, she s an intelligent woman, she spent a lot of time in the white house. you should not operate in the way she did, and i have got to believe it was not consistent
anyone is unplugged from reading e-mail on vacation to sleeping with a blackberry next to the pillow. the huffington post explores how nobody in washington seems to know how to stop working. we ll have that coming up.
sharing meta data with law enforcement agencies. you and i have a common background. we re judges before we did what we now do. right. andrew: is this legal? well, the supreme court says if a third party has your phone records, then maybe you don t have a right to privacy. judge, if it is legal, it s still very, very wrong. the 4th amendment should require them to have probable cause before they grab all our phone logs and of course, we were told, oh, it s only the log, it s only the meta data. they re getting more than that, we finds out. it s been publicly revealed. andrew: you voted about two weeks ago on the floor of the house of representatives to stop the nsa from sweeping everybody s phone records to go after bad guys when they have but to stop reading e-mail of the rest of us. you did that in defines of republican leadership defiance of the republican leadership and the white house.
second. initially explain what this is to lay people, p if you will. if you re like me, you would like to learn to play a musical instrument like a piano but don t have the time to do the practice. wouldn t it be great if you could rehearse songs you want to learn without paying attention to them. we have discovered this effect of pass tiv learning where it seems possible to do that. we ve made this glove called the mobile music touch. it s a wireless device that hooks into your cell phone or laptop. so while reading e-mail or watching a video or doing what you normally would do, the system plays the song you want to learn. in this case, we re doing amazing grace. and as each note is played, vibrators in the fingerless glove vibrate to correspond to that note on the piano. what s amazing, in about a haf hour you can learn the muscle