mental health. douglas, i ll get your reactio but i ll also put on the screen a wall street journal quote from a long time i.t. worker who left for a new job. this is what we are apparently seeing a lot of. this spring mr. moses gave notice and started a new job. a technical writer at at doc you sign. he said it feels wonderful to take my staunch love for proper grammar and make it into a job. what is this trend? this is exactly what capitalism offers, the chance to match her job to the kinds of things that you like, the products that you want. competitive labor market allows people to quit and go to another job that matches their skills and career ambitions. the idea that quitting is exactly backwards. it s the opportunity to capitalism gives you to make a living and live the lifestyle that they want. sandra: it s a great point. robert, you re also a business guy, former head of ubs america.
bit of a 24 hour all night poke game. i think president trump really likes the u.s. position right now. he is looking calm and confident . and want to get your reactio to the former national security advisor, recently shedding negative light on the trump administration handling of nort korea. this is what he said. the idea that we are somehow exerting maximum pressure on north korea is just unfortunately not true. when the president says i m not worried about short-range missiles, he s actually saying i m not worried about the potential risk to american troops deployed in the nation o treating training allies in south korea and japan. that is a dangerous message. more importantly, what message does that send about the u.s. t north korea when you hear from the former national security advisor criticizing the u.s. policy. ambassador bolton is saying and it provokes allies, i m get it. the main point from trump s vie
that bar last summer. i want to bring in nbc military analyst, what is your reaction here? we have to remember that this is not just any place, it is a military installation. so where ever the action is taking place is just a small part of what the jurat requirement is. you have ammunition stores, flight line, flight towers, baracbar barricks. the reactio is never just to the sight of the shooting. not just all of the time, but particularly in a situation like this, so the cooperation between the civilian police on base, the patrol, the military police, and the local police, and other
reactio reactions, no surprise that this was a very controversial incident from the beginning and will continue to be controversial as it goes forward. i would push back on the issue of political decision that the inference that the commissioner in this case was just responding to the dictate of the mayor. sorry, didn t happen, wouldn t happen with this commissioner, wouldn t have happened with me. that s not the relationship i have with mayor de blasio, not the relationship i believe that my successor, jim o neill has. it is his decision based on the facts and circumstances presented to him. and it s a difficult decision and one that in the long run pleases nobody. let s talk about what led to this. you and i talked earlier this morning about or earlier today about the idea that this
they wanted to take away because even though it lay that out quite clearly that exoneration is not the duty of this task, it s not part of what they can determine. it s only whether or not there s enough evidence to prosecute and if you don t have it, then you don t have it and that s the end of the story. i want to get to some of what you were doing today, congressman collins, because you i think that a lot of americans hope that now we are going to get some things done on capitol hill and i think you expressed sort of a similar feeling today when you were talking about immigration at a hearing that you are at which was about another topic, but let s watch what you said today about this and get your reactio reaction. my college claim look, i m going to stop. i m not going to read this. this you know it is dehumanizing? continuing to bring the same witnesses or the same people from the same age to talk about this over and over and over