thinks all attention is good and i think a lot of peopl have come to believe that he s correct about that, probably because of 2016. i remain skeptical i actually things have bee inverted a bit i want to get your reactio because you worked a manhattan da s office under morgan thought, whose two d. a. s ago the da between bragg and morgan, vance had said this on meet th press, interestingly there was a federal case in th southern district it was not produced, purse pursued by the manhattan da here s what he had to say abou that take a listen. i want to get into th deliberations that might b covered by the grand jur material, but as i believe you know, i was asked by the u.s attorney s office and th southern district to stand dow on our investigation, which ha commenced, involve the trump organization and as, you know, as someone who respects that office a great deal, and believing that they may have perhaps the best laws to investigate, i did so. it seems to remain to m that the fed
and reflecting on the moment that we are in, i want to just to talk about where we are as country at this moment thank you, ayman, for you question it is a solemn time fo america. it sets a terrible precedent t indict a former president of the united states, and the onl precedent worse than that is not to indict a former president if he committed crime. and donald trump like any othe american is entitled to th presumption of innocence in court of criminal law. we have an entire third branch of government dedicated to resolving whether or not someone committed crimes and a judge or jury will asses the evidence and then decide i donald trump is guilty so we should let our judicia system do its job withou political interference that is the american way specifically of the reactio from some of the republicans i want to get your reaction to them and how they have bee responding to this moment in particular senator lindsey graham of south carolina let me play for you what he an how he re
the united states, and the onl precedent worse than that is not to indict a former president if he committed crime. and donald trump like any othe american is entitled to th presumption of innocence in court of criminal law. we have an entire third branch of government dedicated to resolving whether or not someone committed crimes and a judge or jury will asses the evidence and then decide i donald trump is guilty so we should let our judicia system do its job withou political interference that is the american way specifically of the reactio from some of the republicans i want to get your reaction to them and how they have bee responding to this moment in particular senator lindsey graham of south carolina let me play for you what he an how he reacted to this news on fox. watch. give the president some money to fight this. this is going to destroy america. we are going to fight back a the ballot box we are not going to give in. how does this and, shawn trump wins in court? and he w
testimonial evidence i also, i m now going to speculate with my friend dan horwitz, after listening to mr davis, i said, you know what, bet you there will be conspiracy count because that is a way to bring in all that evidence he was top by the national inquirer and david pecker, a playboy model, and he di testify, as mr. davis confirmed, twice. i said, a ha so, you re right, dan. it was a very good presentatio on behalf of his client. and i think it speaks to what prosecutor is going to have to say to the jury. this is why you can believ this person. dan horwitz, your reactio to what lanny davis just said? i completely agree with everything kathryn and andre said two thoughts, leave you with two thoughts one, this is not alvin bragg o the da team s first rodeo. they know exactly what they re doing. and people should remember
to what lanny davis just said? i completely agree with everything catherine and andre said two thoughts, leave you with two thoughts one, this is not alvin bragg o the da team s first rodeo. they know exactly what they re doing. and people should remember that forget about everything that leslie dubeck said, all true these are highly experienced prosecutors, who brought sophisticated cases and wo these cases many time. thought number one thought two, this is a cas which is built on layers o evidence and that is what lanny was explaining this is not just one witness as andrew said this is layers upon layers upo layers, brought by a highl experienced team o prosecutors. so, i leave you with those two thoughts, lawrence andrew weissmann, as we g