encrypted. one of the things we are about to release is the ability to encrypt your d.m. tucker: that s pretty heavy duty though because a lot of well-known people reporters talking to sources, government officials, rich people around the world are d.m.ing each other. and the assumption obviously was incorrect but that was private but that was being read by various governments? yeah. that seems to be yes. ainsley: now is he moving to create a system where you can encrypt your dm messages and for part-time who don t use twitter dm is a private message. if you wanted to write pete a message on dm. pete: you could if i allow it and follow each other. there is parameters. if you follow it closely you knew that these are not encrypt thed, secure messages but the assumption is that they are. steve: it s a secret. pete: you go to whatsapp, signal. go to other places that are for secure. but the fact that the government had access to it is the next level. steve: governments.
incidentally swept up in the process of monitoring non-u.s. citizens who are out of the country via fieza. there were all these safeguards and multilayered protections. carter page didn t get them but presumably we re entitled to them. but now, to know, not just the u.s. intelligence agencies but foreign intelligence agencies had access to our direct messages? this is astonishing and a huge first amendment violation and good for elon musk taking a financial hit to expose all of this. harris: the federal government is going to have to pay for some divorces if some of this stuff gets out. private messages are what they are, they call them d.m. s, there s rap songs written about jumping into my d.m. s. they re supposed to be difficult to get into! ainsley: that bothered me a lot because it s the government spying on us. if this isn t big brother, i don t know what is. you worked at the white house before elon bought twitter. who knows what d.m. s they were reading of your staff which
understand how it all works. sandra: always terrified when the government wants to step in to regulate something they don t know enough about. tell me which regulatory body is going a crack job on what they are regulating. hand a.i. over to them? elon musk said and i think the go of the is looking in on your d.m. so control over a.i., what are they going to look into when they have this. regulation is easy to say, it s hard to do well. i m more interested in what elon musk is building, is he going to build something, create something sandra: truth gpt. that s what he calls it. i don t know what it s going to do. a lot of people have called for a pause. let s understand the technology before we continue to roll it out. on our program we have been having conversations that china is full steam ahead, too late to put the cat back in the box and cannot pause if china will
learning a little bit more about the other sites that the 28 year old shooter plan to visit after opening fire inside of this private christian school. according to authorities, the 28 year old was ready for a confrontation with police from the get go, according to investigators. she had several rounds of ammunition. she had planned out this entire attack, according to some writings and statements that authorities are attributing to her. they say that she knew exactly what she was doing. she laid out this attack. she knew the entry points. to this school, and so we re expected to learn a little bit more about some outstanding questions in this investigation . now overnight. we also learned about a direct message dm that was set by the 28 year old shooter to a former basketball teammate ever, ever. rihanna patton tells us that she received this d. m. shortly before the shooting yesterday morning. it reads. quote one day
and look at what they ve got, how strong do you think their case is and as a defense attorney how do you try to poke holes in it? you know, i i find the list unremarkable. it s one thing to collect this evidence, another to connect it to the crime. the list that they have described can be in anybody s house. a glove, a computer, dog hair, a hair. ok, great. what i think is going to be most revealing is get into that computer forensically and find out what he was doing. the evidence that has not been confirmed, perhaps kohberger did try to d.m. or connect on social media with one of the victims and so far that s the only shred of evidence we have that he knew these victims. so right now i m not worried about this as a defense attorney, i want to see what these items reveal. that s going to be where the rubber meets the road. john: thanks for your expertise, appreciate it. good to see you. thank you, same here. sandra: liberal cities