a thoughtful person. dina didn t just insist something wasn t right. she opened her checkbook and hired her own experts. including dr. judy melinek, a respected forensic pathologist who reviewed the autopsy report and photos and who also disagreed with the official conclusion. max had too many injuries to be explained with a simple accidental fall. dr. melinek thought max s injuries indicated he d been assaulted before he fell. what s more, she questioned whether the fall itself could have happened as the sheriff s department described it. measurements showed the railing was 32 inches high. 6-year-old max was only 45 inches tall. his center of gravity was too low. even on the razor scooter his center of gravity is too low to go over that bannister. it all pointed to a chilling alternate scenario. according to dr. melinek,
he had been assaulted before he fail. what s more she suspected whether the fall could happen as the sheriff s department described it. measurements showed the railing was 32 inches high, six-year-old max was only 45 inches tall. his center of gravity was too low. even on a razor scooter, his center of gravity is too low to go over the banister. it all pointed to a chilling alternate scenario. according to the doctor, someone assaulted max, and then he somehow went over the bannister, in other words, this was a homicide. i would much rather have them say that this is an accident in here s what. no mom wants to hear that her son was a victim of a homicide. and if someone killed max, the doctor s theory focus on one person. i think rebecca was somehow involved, but how much she was involved and to what degree, she took that to the grave. that alarming suspicion was
fail. once more she suspected whether the fall could happen as the sheriff s department described it. measurements showed the railing was 32 inches high, six-year-old max was only 45 inches tall. his center of gravity was too low. even on a razor scooter, his center of gravity is too low to go over the banister. it all pointed to a chilling alternate scenario. according to the doctor, someone assaulted max and then he somehow went over the bannister, in other words, this was a homicide. i would much rather have them say that this is an accident in here s what. no mom wants to hear that her son was a victim of a homicide. and if someone killed max, the doctor s theory focus on one person. i think rebecca was somehow involved, but how much she was involved into a degree, she took that to the grave. that alarming suspicion was only the beginning. because it wasn t just dina who
Woodstock Bourbon and Cola Raspberry Edition
Woodstock Raspberry tastes like if a Liquorice Allsort and a rat had a kid. It tastes like a raspberry bun except instead of filling it with jam, they filled with regurgitated Billy Mavs. It tastes like a Razor Scooter to the ankle. It tastes like binge drinking on a dark field when you’re 16. It tastes like the karma you get for stealing other people s drinks at parties.
I consumed Woodstock Bourbon and Cola Raspberry Edition pre-pint night as usual. There is something special about drinking on a Wednesday, it makes your whole week feel much cruisier. However, this drink came very close to ruining my night. It leaves this vile after-taste which makes your entire mouth feel nasty, like you’ve been sucking on a lollipop someone stuck up their bum. It creates a vicious cycle, where you keep drinking it to wash the taste out of your mouth, which ends up making it worse. Pint night was excellent. I ended up laughing hysterically at shi
Monday, April 12, 2021
The U.S. International Trade Commission (“ITC”) recently terminated
CERTAIN MOTORIZED SELF-BALANCING VEHICLES, Investigation No. 337-TA-1000, brought by Razor USA LLC against alleged infringers of a patent related to electric hoverboards, denying Razor any relief. In doing so, the ITC confirmed that an original patent is surrendered when a Reissue Patent issues, even if a pending Continuation Application from the Reissue Application includes the claims of the original patent.
The ITC instituted Investigation No. 337-TA-1000 in May 2016. On the same day the ITC instituted the investigation, the Complainant, Razor USA LLC, sought reissue of the asserted patent, U.S. Patent No. 8,738,278 (“the ’278 patent”), but subsequently requested that the PTO suspend examination of the reissue application during the investigation, which it did. The Investigation proceeded to a hearing and the ITC found no violation of section 337. The ITC found that n