non credit of people s money. you were aware that an important part of their case in the criminal proceedings was that the underlying discrepancy was caused by bugs, errors or defects in horizon. rays t errors or defects in horizon. as i said, errors or defects in horizon. as i said. not errors or defects in horizon. as i said. riot in errors or defects in horizon. as i said, not in this errors or defects in horizon. as i said, not in this case. errors or defects in horizon. i said, not in this case. this case must earlier that they did not credit somebody s deposit. you as an individual, me as a business or somebody else is a treasure i have made a complaint saying, i am paying money to a post office and it is not in my account. that is what was being investigated on this occasion. can we look at 440036, plays? irate can we look at 440036, plays? we have can we look at 440036, plays? - have seen defence statements in other cases, and this is the defence statement in the sta
lines that had been raised by the defence in that case? rays t lines that had been raised by the defence in that case? defence in that case? as i said, that s mitigation. defence in that case? as i said, that s mitigation. they - defence in that case? as i said, that s mitigation. they have i defence in that case? as i said, | that s mitigation. they have said they committed that offence because they committed that offence because they were having losses, but they never said, they were having losses, but they neversaid, i had a they were having losses, but they never said, i had a loss of this day and this, because they are making the paperwork correct. if and this, because they are making the paperwork correct. and this, because they are making the paperwork correct. if they were makinr the paperwork correct. if they were making the the paperwork correct. if they were making the paper the paperwork correct. if they were making the paper were the paperwork correct. if they wer
case. . investigating theft in the neald case, , ., .. investigating theft in the neald case. , ,, ., ., ., so investigating theft in the neald case. . ,, ., ., ., soat case. yes, sefton and neald. so at that time. case. yes, sefton and neald. so at that time. you case. yes, sefton and neald. so at that time, you are case. yes, sefton and neald. so at that time, you are investigating - case. yes, sefton and neald. so at that time, you are investigating a l that time, you are investigating a particular case in relation to discrepancies in horizon, and you were aware that there was a post office line that is that the system is a robust one. in office line that is that the system is a robust one. is a robust one. in there, but as i said before is a robust one. in there, but as i said before about is a robust one. in there, but as i said before about taking - is a robust one. in there, but as i said before about taking it - is a robust one. in there, but as i said before about t