rattled that they re lower than donald trump. the new york post has this advice for him. the u.s. loves a winner, not a weiner, joe biden. this comes after the reports that the president is frustrated with his staff fearing their cleanup campaign makes his look weak. just yesterday they walked back his comments again. this time on handguns. a 9 millimeter bullet blows the lung out of the body. so the idea of these high caliber weapons, there s no rationale basis for it in terms of self-respect. he support as ban on the sale of assault weapons and high capacity magazines and expanded background checks to keep guns out of the dangerous hands. kayleigh: that was the walk back. that was on inflation, the number 1 issue to voters. they doubled down on his take that it was just temporary. some folks have raised worries this could be a sign of persistent inflation. that s not our view. over time as the economy is turning back on, we see the transitory effects. that s wha
rattled that they re lower than donald trump. the new york post has this advice for him. the u.s. loves a winner, not a weiner, joe biden. this comes after the reports that the president is frustrated with his staff fearing their cleanup campaign makes his look weak. just yesterday they walked back his comments again. this time on handguns. a 9 millimeter bullet blows the lung out of the body. so the idea of these high caliber weapons, there s no rationale basis for it in terms of self-respect. he support as ban on the sale of assault weapons and high capacity magazines and expanded background checks to keep guns out of the dangerous hands.
so, i don t support a federal mandate there, but at the same time there s a better, more rationale basis for that action versus targeting every business in america over 100 employees. that s where the government overreach comes from and that is going to be undermining our efforts. when you brought up the smallpox example, one of the reasons i think why businesses don t have to worry about it is because it s mandated in schools. right. and basically it is pretty, you know, we ve done a pretty good job making sure people get it. do you think the covid vaccine once it is approved, is that the best place to do the mandate? on the schools first? historically. we have utilized that tool in the schools for the broad public safety. we may be to that point in our country at some point. but right now we re not even approved by the fda for under 12. we ve only had one of the
concerns. republican or democrat, doesn t make a difference. shepard: on the matter of policy that the supreme court did not delve into that area to you is perfectly on point or something else? that they didn t delve into the shepard: the policy. absolutely. once you start to do that, you re down a slippery slope. what the chief justi said is so long as there s a rationale basis. this is a legal term. if the presidential authority is solid in the law, even if there s a discriminatory intent to the law, if you can find a rationale basis for it, i.e. national security, it s okay. he listed a number of things with the president and the administration tried to tailor and limit. it s 8% of the muslim countries. countries that i can tell you as a homeland security person that don t have proper vetting processes that represent a danger to the community. from previous administrations, congress itself, intelligence security people said that represent adanger. so as you can see, shepar
scary to think that comments made on the campaign trail are going to come back to be used in a court of appeals or a federal district court or the supreme court as a basis for inidating later actions. dana: do you think that this is precedent setting in that regard? yes and no. it s interesting. justice roberts says we re allowing for that information to seep in. we re considering the information about trump s statements on the stump but we re not letting it win the day. there s so much deference to the congress and to the president when it comes to immigration enforcement. the court is saying this is in their ballpark. all it takes is a rationale basis to assume that this law is correct and we find there was a rationale basis for it. dana: james, this is not the final word. the supreme court has the final word now but it goes back to the lower court what is the next step? it goes back to the lower court. but there s a pretty darn clear