[cheers and applause] daniel showed extraordinary poise at a most difficult moment. as you have seen, he is here tonight with the president of the associated students of the university of arizona, please, welcome as.u. apresident emily fritzy and daniel hernandez jr. good evening. i would like to start by expressing my sincere gratitude
[cheers and applause] daniel showed extraordinary poise at a most difficult moment. as you have seen, he is here tonight with the president of the associated students of the university of arizona, please, welcome as.u. apresident emily fritzy and daniel hernandez jr. good evening. i would like to start by expressing my sincere gratitude
[cheers and applause] daniel showed extraordinary poise at a most difficult moment. as you have seen, he is here tonight with the president of the associated students of the university of arizona, please, welcome as.u. apresident emily fritzy and daniel hernandez jr. good evening. i would like to start by expressing my sincere gratitude
found that tax cuts for high earners would have the lowest what they call bang for the buck. right. chris: of any of them to boost the economy because they say high earners are more likely to save the money than to spend it. fir of all, first of all, the bureaucrats at the congressiol budget office who don t create jobs and aren t entrepreneurs gave you their bureaucratic interpretation of y.al the thing that the president doesn t understand and economics get wrong is real simple. do you want people to have enough morn any to invest to create jy obs. surplus of a incomeo they can create jobs that is somehow bad and the president wants to take away the income. that means he is leaving them with no money to create jobs. virtually every entrepreneur in this country says this day-after-day i m not creating any jobs while this guy is apresident because he wants to take awa the money. why would i risk my capital to create a job so he can increase
subpoenaed.under article 2, on the executive power vested in the president of the united states. mr. mueller cannot subpoena the president because the only way apresident to be held accountable whether it s allegedly criminal or not is through impeachment . nothing else. chris: i want to bring lanny davis and because there s never been a case exactly like this. doing a quick history lesson this week, over the course of our history, thomas jefferson, richard nixon and your client, bill clinton have all been forced to submit to court orders. can president trump be subpoenaed to testify? first of all, mr. joseph digenova. who i ve known for a great deal of years and have tremendous respect for. we don t know what the supreme court will do and it will ultimately be a supreme court question. presidentclinton decided to accept voluntary voluntarily