examples of the department of justice politicization. this is a problem always in politics, nuance is sometimes hard to do. this is probably the best shot because they do want to have some separation between himself and trump without alienating the gop base and give it a little time. we are still a couple months from the first debates. they are betting this will pass the immediate trump show and they will get a chance to make those arguments more fully before national primary audience. paul: the argument your hearing from democrats, judge eileen cannon, district court judge will hear this case, picked randomly, should recuse herself because she was appointed by donald trump and she made a ruling in the past in favor of trump s position. what do you make of that claim that she should step out?
quickly. the wildcard is judge, cnn judge aileen cannon, the trump appointee, not just a trump appointee, but someone who has already been overturned on the basis of showing too much partiality to president trump, former president trump. judge cannon is to recruit herself from this, case that is what needs to happen. the question, is whether the prosecution will move for it or not. the rules for recusal, the standards for recusal, whether it could look as though someone s partiality could be in question, it is perception that actually matters. in this case, she was chosen, randomly and this is how it happens, but in this case, as much as we, once we have seen this exact judge, slow peddling, this exact case. so when time is of the essence because justice delayed is justice, denied when the stakes are so high, this is exactly what the rules of recusal are there for. i would simply say, that we have sat at this table a few times, you did not hear you