tonight to know he s using to bankroll his campaign. ted cruz set out to prove he s the angriest fiercest most indignant anyone running. he held it with every word he spoke. is he clearly intending to be there when donald trump falls. he wants to be beyond any reasonable doubt the farthest right candidate from across the board from his foreign policy to his all out opposition to what he calls amnesty for illegal immigrants. carly fiorina made it she is the one candidate with no embarrassment about nailing hillary clinton personally in the general election. jeb bush showed he could stand up to the holy. he showed a tad more energy, even defending his brother s decision to defend your rack. ran paul stood up to the neocons. mike huckabee stood up for religious right. donald trump, there is the
your thoughts. the one standout i thought was maybe john kasich. seemed he was running a general election, not a republican primary. when it came to tone, he talked about working and bringing people together. not being partisan. he didn t get a big reaction. be curious to see if he has any impact in the upcoming polls after that debate. a lot of the issues, there always was one sort of outlier. rand paul was the outlier on the foreign policy, on the iraq war and ben carson, donald trump a little bit. on immigration, jeb bush tried not to go as deep as donald trump did.
election candidate. however, i don t think i think we would have liked his manner. this close quarters exchange with donald trump, very snarky is his natural habitat. he looked to be uncomfortable. he wasn t energetic, but he did not look after goal in that f r four. it was interesting who like it. carly fiorina like it, and marco rubio really liked it. christie liked it. randy paul said he could not be trusted with the nuclear codes. trump fired back. i think there is a soft quality that is entertaining about mr. trump. his visceral response to attack people on their appearance, short, tall, fact, ugly. my goodness, that happened in junior high. are we not way above that and all worried to have someone like that in charged of the nuclear arson?
survival of western civilization. this is not just a little conflict with a middle eastern country. to give them this agreement that the president treats like the magna carta, but the iranians treat it like it s toilet paper. and we must simply make it very clear that the next president, one of us on this stage, will absolutely not honor that agreement and will destroy it and will be tough with iran because otherwise we put every person in this world in a dangerous place. there were a few candidates tonight in the republican debate who pushed back against the hawkish line. senator rand paul said ripping up the nuclear deal right away was wrong. should we cut up the agreement immediately? that s absurd. wouldn t you want to know if they complied? i m going to vote against the agreement because i don t think there is significant leverage. that doesn t mean i would look at the agreement and cut it up without seeing whether iran is complying. here is something important. governor joh
the president treats like the magna carta, but the iranians treat it like it s toilet paper. and we must simply make it very clear that the next president, one of us on this stage, will absolutely not honor that agreement and will destroy it and will be tough with iran because otherwise we put every person in this world in a dangerous place. there were a few candidates tonight in the republican debate who pushed back against the hawkish line. senator rand paul said ripping up the nuclear deal right away was wrong. should we cut up the agreement immediately? that s absurd. wouldn t you want to know if they complied? i m going to vote against the agreement because i don t think there is significant leverage. that doesn t mean i would look at the agreement and cut it up without seeing whether iran is complying. here is something important. governor john kasich of ohio pushed back against senator ted cruz hard line on iran. this was a real debate.