they fretted on group chats when their guns were stolen from unlocked vehicles. explain how that culture was reflected in the testimony that you heard. it was really remarkable. certainly in the federal case the clear point was trying to establish the racial bias, the raeshl animus that these men exhibited towards black men and ahmaud arbery in particular, but the subtext in the whole thing is how many people were carrying guns? it wasn t the three men or two men convicted of the killing. william mcmichael was not armed on the day of the killing but they said they were investigating reports of break-ins or sfrans video where arbery had been seen. it was several days before the killing of aari. one man went over to check out this house and the man s wife was testified that they considered him a threat and they
said there was no racial animist. and the media created a raeshl narrative where there was thought one. and perhaps those facts and the race of the gunmen is racial he inconvenient. and so the media doesn t want to want are them. you are doing a transfer of responsibility away from the perpetrators and their personal crim this will behaefr. theyed not be aenl to kill hem if not an okay to guns. if and i this is no reason to pass the bahs. what if it could go from the states to the federal reggist