Homeland of the ramaytush alone. Who are the original inhabitants of the San Francisco peninsula. As the indigenous stewards of this land, and in accordance with their traditions, the Ramaytush Ohlone have never ceded loss nor forgotten their responsibilities as the caretakers of this place. As well as for all people who reside in their traditional territory. As guests, we recognize that we benefit from living and working on their traditional homeland. We wish to pay our respects by acknowledging the ancestors, elders and relatives of the ramaytush community and by affirming their sovereign rights as first peoples. This meeting is being held in hybrid format, with the meeting occurring in person in city hall, room 416 broadcast live on govtv and available on view on zoom or listen to by. Calling 166919006833 using meeting. Id 89641684613. We welcome the publics participation during Public Comment periods. While there will be an opportunity for general Public Comment at the beginning of
Broadcast live on govtv and available on view on zoom or listen to by. Calling 166919006833 using meeting. Id 89641684613. We welcome the publics participation during Public Comment periods. While there will be an opportunity for general Public Comment at the beginning of the meeting and there will be an opportunity to comment on each discussion or or action item on the agenda. Each comment is limited to three minutes. For those attending remotely, the commission will hear up to 20 minutes of remote Public Comment total for each agenda item because of the 20 minute time limit, it is possible that not every person in the queue will have an opportunity to provide remote Public Comment. Remote Public Comment from people who have received an accommodation due to disability will not count towards the 20 minute limit. Public comment will be taken both in person and remotely by video or call in for each item. The commission will take Public Comment first from people attending the meeting in p
Soma, outser mission, very competitive marketplace with low unemployment rates are going to continue through the life of this agreement, but we think weve now really hit a stride with this excelsior, client town, southeast neighborhoods. Program the 40 goal was attained and that well continue this high rate. We are also very pleased to report that over 70 of those hires are august 14thjuly 2015. Coming from targeted neighborhoods the systems were filled with identified in the d. A. Our referrals. 74 of the 80 hires were from additional accomplishments from the Development Agreement as you the priority neighborhoods from the heard, weve not only initiated agreement and i just mentioned on the last slide. Community discussion at the saint lukes this is a vast improvement over the first year. At the end of the first year campus but weve had community they did a 13year deficit of a hiring engagement at all of our campuses. There are always going to be deficit down to 11. Members at im plea
Engineering relates to internship. As you can see we are at 64 . 16 out of 25. The third one is 50 of new entry level of new candidates of our System Training program. We are challenged on this one. This deficit is due to a citywide shortage particularly in apprentice ironworkers in this sector of construction right now. That being said, going to the final one which is the big number with the project when it relates to construction and that deals with the percentage of trade hours for Union Journey men and apprentices. You can see the slide we are at 34 of work hours performed by San Francisco residents. Thats a good number. So, just quickly i know there is a lot of interest what neighborhood folks are coming from to take advantage of these opportunities. We have the breakdown here with the largest 18 which is two neighborhoods. We go by zip code. 94110 at 18 . 91434 at 12 . I think its consistent with the kind of clients we serve and neighborhoods that tend to have higher poverty rate
Thank you, scott sanchez, planning department. I will be brief and wanted to note we reviewed the most community revised plans were submitted to the board of appeals on january 10, 2013. The date on the revision set is january 7th,2013 and these comply with the planning code and im available. Im sorry they do comply . They do comply. That is correct. Thank you. Is there any Public Comment . Seeing none, commissioners, the matter is submitted. Commissioner i reviewed the drawings and they reflect what i remember of the proposed changes at that point in time and im prepared to move to uphold the permit and condition it on the documentation that has been provided to reflect the changes. Is that the appropriate it sounds like what you want to do is grant the appeal and uphold the permit on the condition that it is revised, to reflect the changes. And i would ask just that plan set be noted by date. Submitted to the board, which is january 10, 2013. Okay. So moved. Im inclined to move in th