democratic welfare states of europe certainly strengthenaes romney s point? it certainly does explain a lot about why this president couldn t triangulate like bill clinton and adjust to the marketplace and he holds and clings to this rigid ideology of his. now, he he downplayed his relationships with the radical friends. he downplayed his relationship with a.c.o.r.n., he denied a relationship with this group. what do you think this means? what does this tell us about him? well, sean, there was really a vast network of radical connections that barack obama was part of. i lay it out in my book, radical in chief. i think that obama denied his a.c.o.r.n. connection, not because his limited work with them on voter registration was so bad. but because he was afraid that if he acknowledged the
democratic welfare states of europe certainly strengthenaes romney s point? it certainly does explain a lot about why this president couldn t triangulate like bill clinton and adjust to the marketplace and he holds and clings to this rigid ideology of his. now, he he downplayed his relationships with the radical friends. he downplayed his relationship with a.c.o.r.n., he denied a relationship with this group. what do you think this means? what does this tell us about him? well, sean, there was really a vast network of radical connections that barack obama was part of. i lay it out in my book, radical in chief. i think that obama denied his a.c.o.r.n. connection, not because his limited work with them on voter registration was so bad. but because he was afraid that if he acknowledged the
this is less than half of them. but or than that, there is nothing to see here. just move on with your lives. nothing to see here, folks. they were a pair of columbia university professors, married couple that developed a revolutionary technique in 1960s to force political change still used in the country today in a massive way. their mission flood the system with impossible demapdz so the system will collapse. new one can form. they write a great deal about richard cloward and frances fox piven in a new book radical in chief and explains the strategy and influence on the country and president. now. around 1966, richard cloward and frances fox piven met with a civil rights activist named george wiley and created the national welfare rights organization.
but other than that, there is nothing to see here. just move on with your lives. nothing to see here folks. they were a pair of columbia university professors, married couple who developed a revolutionary technique in the 1960s to force political change that s still being used in this country today in a massive way. their mission, flood the system with impossible demands so the system will collapse. and a new one can form. stanley curtis writes a great deal about richard cloward and frances fox piven in the new book radical in chief and explains their strategy and influence on our country and our president. now. 1966, richard cloward and frances fox piven met with a civil rights activist george wiley and created the national welfare rights organization.
it s not like you re overpowered or anything like this. there s more. this is less than half of them. but or than that, there is nothing to see here. just move on with your lives. nothing to see here, folks. they were a pair of columbia university professors, married couple that developed a revolutionary technique in 1960s to force political change still used in the country today in a massive way. their mission flood the system with impossible demapdz so the system will collapse. new one can form. they write a great deal about richard cloward and frances fox piven in a new book radical in chief and explains the strategy and influence on the country and president. now. around 1966, richard