the supreme court s six three decision striking down the use of racial preferences in college admissions. biden was sentpreferen out by wr winds him up to lie. aff affirmative action is so s misunderstood. many people wrongly believe that affirmative action allows unequal white students, unqualified students to be admitted ahead of qualifie d. this is not this is not how college admissions work. now, the white house comms people aren t that ignorant.w th they know the truth that the entire point of preferences is to give minority candidates an edg me, regardless ofheir their test scores or the transcripts, or resume trani it s classic discrimination and it s based on race. colleges set out standards for admission and every student, every student has to meet those standards. meeand only that after firstmen meeting, the qualifications required by the school to college forget other factors. in additio other factorsn to thh such as race. okaasy what s less believablb that h
the case was an absolute tour ih de forcee the best piece ofth legal analysis and writing i think i ve ever read.ent ri he went right at the university s reliance on raciat l checking and admissions. you have to read in t all. racial categories, he wrote, are little more than stereotypte ,suggesting that immutable characteristics somehow conclusives determine a persons ideology, beliefs and abilities . of course, that s false. members of the same race ds o nt all share the exact same experiences and viewpoints. d far it a black person fromon rural alabama surely different experiences than a black person from manhattan or a blacfromk fi generation immigrant from nigeria. in the same way that a white persongrt from from rural vermo a different perspective than a white persona from houston,n, texas university s racial idens university s racial identity alone constitutes the being of the race or man the man that is the same naked