thank you for having me. i was talking to a family member of about how i ve had five years to prepare for this decision with the expectation it would come down this way and i was so sad. i m still pretty heartbroken about it. when i think about the ways that my experience would ve been limited had i not had the opportunity to be around a diverse student body think about the losses that future students will face looking forward. it s pretty heartbreaking to me. let me try to share with you some of justin clarence thomas s logic in doing it. but he wanted to end up limited and affirmative action that today s youth should not shoulder the moral death of their ancestors and also says that racialism simply cannot be undone by different or more racialism, so what you think of his logic? i think that logic is a very basic level disingenuous i
would come down this way. and i am still so sad. i am still pretty heartbroken about it. when i think about the ways that my experience would have been-limited had i not had the opportunity to be around a diverse student body, when i think of the losses that future black and brown students will face, looking forward, it is just pretty heartbreaking to me. let me try to share with you some of justice clarence thomas s logic. in doing, he said he wanted to end affirmative action. and he wrote for a memo majority opinion that quote, it is youth should not shoulder the moral debts of their in sisters. saying racialism, simply cannot be undone by different or more racialism. so what do you think of his logic? i think that logic is at a very basic level, disingenuous. and i think that he is aware of that. because he has made it his mission to dismantle affirmative action or holistic
i saw where justice jackson said it. i like reading john roberts opinion and then reading both clarence thomas and judge jackson. you have two african-american people on the court and they have strong disagreements about this, thomas rights racialism isn t be undone by different or more racialism. we haven t mentioned it was asian-american student who is brought this case. they felt they were being discriminated against. they weren t asking for specific numbers to be allowed in. they were asking for fairness. so many things have changed. sandra day o connor in 2003 said in 25 years, i imagine this will probably not going to be necessary anymore. well, where are we now? it s 2023 and in 2005 when i was a spokesperson for justice roberts in his confirmation hearing, this issue came up. he s been working on this for a long time. it took this case by these
The speech, full of vague phrases, again demonstrated the Democratic Party’s reliance on the promotion of racial politics to block a socialist movement of the working class and youth in opposition to capitalism and war.