inflationary of its own. short term, spot on. but they have stored up a problem spot on. but they have stored up a problem for spot on. but they have stored up a problem for the future. problem for the future. thank you very much problem for the future. thank you very much for problem for the future. thank you very much for that. problem for the future. thank you very much for that. i problem for the future. thank you very much for that. i am - problem for the future. thank you very much for that. i am going - problem for the future. thank you very much for that. i am going to| very much for that. i am going to have to move on because we have a couple of more stories to take a quick look at. back to the front page of the guardian, again this legal challenge we are hearing of doreen lawrence, prince harry among the list of famous figures launching legal action against the publisher of the daily mail, rachel let s touch on this one briefly? this is extraordinary, touch on th
and down and life saving treatment and others, that is accounted for. i’m others, that is accounted for. i m sure we will others, that is accounted for. i m sure we will hear others, that is accounted for. i m sure we will hear a lot more about that and journalists, looking ahead to what could happen. let s move on to what could happen. let s move on to the financial times, rachel. this bank of england letter, talk us through that. bank of england letter, talk us through that. this is the bank of encland through that. this is the bank of england explaining through that. this is the bank of england explaining its through that. this is the bank of england explaining its reasoningj through that. this is the bank of. england explaining its reasoning for what happened last week. in the wake of the mini budget, which wasn t all that mini, essentially the uk s financial credibility was trashed on the international markets which made uk debt far less attractive than it had been, whic
has denied all of this in some of these accusations are quite old, many years old. but it really is quite extraordinary and has the potential i think to be as ironing as the original phone hacking scandal. ., ., scandal. let me expand on that, we do have a statement scandal. let me expand on that, we do have a statement from scandal. let me expand on that, we do have a statement from the - do have a statement from the associated newspaper saying, we utterly and unambiguously refute these preposterous smears which appear to be nothing more than a preplanned light to drag us into the phone hacking scandal with articles up phone hacking scandal with articles up to 30 years old. digby, what is your take on that briefly? the first 20 ears your take on that briefly? the first 20 years of your take on that briefly? the first 20 years of my your take on that briefly? the first 20 years of my adult your take on that briefly? the first 20 years of my adult life your take on that brie
will probably hang onto this one a bit longer than others. bit longer than others. rachel let me ut to bit longer than others. rachel let me out to the bit longer than others. rachel let me put to the final bit longer than others. rachel let me put to the final point - bit longer than others. rachel let me put to the final point that - bit longer than others. rachel let| me put to the final point that tony could have given. me put to the final point that tony could have given. yeah, i think so. i aaree could have given. yeah, i think so. i agree with could have given. yeah, i think so. i agree with both could have given. yeah, i think so. i agree with both of could have given. yeah, i think so. i agree with both of you could have given. yeah, i think so. i agree with both of you about - could have given. yeah, i think so. i agree with both of you about this| i agree with both of you about this whole i agree with both of you about this whole sort i agree with both of you