it was a long history of the kind of independent politics. no more questions? should we wrap it up? thank you. [applause] all this week, booktv is on c-span2 with your favorite book programs are out today. our in-depth program, originally airing live the first sunday of every month, features a three-hour look into an author s work. with questions from viewers by phone calls, e-mails and tweaks. this sunday, our guest is michael bedwell, co-author and editor of almost a dozen books, including the conquerors, presidential courage, and his latest, jacqueline kennedy. join us live at noon eastern for a three-hour conversation with michael on c-span2 s booktv. up next on booktv, kenneth broward talks about zero club his father, founder of the sierra club. [applause] the wonderful sculpture that is out there my son rubin made a sculpture that is hanging there. [applause] as they say in another area of life, was it is good for you as it was for me? [laughter] we ve been
campaign. this is just over an hour. [applause] thank you. it s not and probably worse than adding to your resume, but it s a very important addition to what was said was that the most passionate, most interesting times i had for the 1976 and 1980 carter campaigns, where i was then the cambridge survey research, running all the analysis with john gorman of the partner patrick does on the plane and working with the speechwriters and a lot of my job was coordinated between sue eisenstadt and the policy people are speechwriters, while everyone else was running around. and also in a team meeting at a surreal experience, which was i played ronald reagan with president carter before the debate. i ll explain later why this was an uncomfortable experience. not because who am i to play break-in, but you might think it s safe professors stream to create the president can say you haven t done well here or you re you re only can they get a b+ fare. alright you get an economy in the tan
they set up a tobacco institute as if it was somehow based in science, and all it was was marketing. you know, four out of five doctors smoke our cigarettes or recommend our cigarettes. you know, crap like that. and it was clearly that kind of the disinformation that the tobacco industry used to sew doubt about the science. the house where you serve, it recently and you know, it s sorry? i was just going to say, you know, rachael carson and the pesticide interests and on and on. the house recently voted against national science foundation funding for political science. in a vote that kind of disturbed me, it was an amendment from representative jeff flake and it didn t take away the funding, it just said the national science foundation could no longer use its funding to fund political science, in part, representative flake said, because the funding was used to support studies on climate change. that subtle and specific
the tobacco companies tried to change the language about cancer. they set up a tobacco institute as if it was somehow based in science, and all it was was marketing. you know, four out of five doctors smoke our cigarettes or recommend our cigarettes. you know, crap like that. and it was clearly that kind of disinformation that the tobacco industry used to sew doubt about the science. the house where you serve, it recently and you know, it s sorry? i was just going to say, you know, rachael carson and the pesticide interests and on and on. the house recently voted against national science foundation funding for political science. in a vote that kind of disturbed me, it was an amendment from representative jeff blake and it didn t take away the funding, it just said the national science foundation could no longer use its funding to fund political science, in part, representative flake said, because the funding
it s what happened with tobacco. the tobacco companies tried to change the language about cancer. they set up a tobacco institute as if it was somehow based in science, and all it was was marketing. you know, four out of five doctors smoke our cigarettes or recommend our cigarettes. you know, crap like that. and it was clearly that kind of the disinformation that the tobacco industry used to sew doubt about the science. the house where you serve, it recently and you know, it s sorry? i was just going to say, you know, rachael carson and the pesticide interests and on and on. the house recently voted against national science foundation funding for political science. in a vote that kind of disturbed me, it was an amendment from representative jeff flake and it didn t take away the funding, it just said the national science foundation could no longer use