i think it is telling that just today you have seen more action as it relates to this case and you have seen coming out of the new york case. yes, one was out ahead. another could catch right up. is that chatter spin? do you think there s any legitimacy to it orit, or do yo think itxd changes depending onf and when i(%ch indictment comes down?xd i m afraid we re learningt( i used to think the different investigations from thexd new yk grand jury around stormy daniels to thexd mar-a-lago case around documents to the department of juss e case around j6, i do think they re different. butfá the early indication for t( voters, probably not. i want to drawçó a contrast of something we saw with joe biden. it s a respectlp for rule of la by the democrats. the one thing that republicans are doing isw3 not only attacki prosecutors, but trying to abstruck the rule of■3 law.
this. and that s why you asked earlier,xd are the four differe legal teams that trump s using coordinating. i suspect they re not. paul butler is right on that. but they are coordinating in the sense that they know u modus operandi. his main play book is delay, delay, delay. so we ve just seen this week in georgia.ú they filed a dock maymy to usev term filin try to stop the grandñi jury fr indicting him. that isn t going anywhere as a legal matter. all an attempt to stay things, bring the case to the georgia court of appeals and perhaps to the georgia supreme court. even this thing today, which trump lost in the d.c. circuit, our nation s second highest krc ì(lc with respect to that, trump may with respect to that, trump may decide to bring it to5aq supreme ñrcourt, theñr u.s. sup court. there is some reporting that he s not inclined to do that.
allt( of them up against the ée[ must do to save not just our countryt( the entire world. that s where we are right c9ñ right-wingjf media personalityf calling for the execution of black politicians because trump might be indicted for alleged crimes. we nb■recently learned on satur trump willçó hold his first ral since announcing his impending indictment in waco, ñitexas. 30-year anniversary of the armek standoff of david çólpkoresh. again, it sw3çó hard to know if trump knows that. if he s going there because of that, or not. this decision to hold this rally there will mean e;lmething. they ll bejf listeningxd to everything he says.
whether there really is somee1w sort of violent protest. but in termsi] of the legal sysm in general, this is something this countryok has not had tot(l with. there are other countries where there are political leaders who m0(ave current andfá former,jf have been held to account, and they have gotten through it. and they have had their systems and eal have had their systems testament to the rule of law, and also peját understanding that if donald trump is indictmented, he s entitled to due process andñr añi presumptif innocence. ultimately, he mayt(q be convic orxd acquitted,xd and people ma have very strong emotions either way, butt( they do have to put their faith in the system in terms of lettingr work.3u(zd i think it could be e country isfáxd naive or e1e1pol about it, comes outfá stronger, understanding that nobody is above the w3law, everyone is entitled to due process and let
there willqáq a court that will set certain deadlinesjf forw3 h%m(e+ery,xd and ultimately aok trial, and he will have to beñrt that t2rl like any other defendant if hefá decides t/■( d trial. so thank you for grounding us j of what this wilt■p look qlike,t( and the fa that they want it to lookxd entirely different than he does. peter, i want to read at( littl more from that reporting. mr. trump has been invigorated and angered by the prospectw3xd being arrested. he s also entertained a certain amount of magical thinking. ford wom worked with him years ago at the trump organization, mr. trump, who was investigated in the 1970s, was frightened of being arrested. het( spent yearsr officials who might havee1