throw out the case. trump has attacked. of course, just about every judge. he s encountered in his legal battles except this one, aileen cannon, who he happened to a point the former president has frequently praised her in public describing her as smart and highly respected on tuesday, judge cannon ruled a variety of political partisans and constitutional scholars who are not otherwise involved in the case can join the oral arguments in two weeks elliot williams, how normal is this? not normal at all? there is literally no reason why the judge needs to have additional folks come in at the oral argument. now, it is a very common practice supreme court does it all the time to have parties outside parties called amicus submitters, right. to file briefs on the court that lay out their views and the judge can read them and help them and crafting her pain, but she doesn t need to have this free for all open where multiple parties, no matter how great their scholarship has been, they
not been aggressive enough. yeah he s in a tough spot that is for sure. given all of the different trials and prosecutions around, both democrats and president trump and republicans. i thought he did a very good job yesterday. i thought particularly, and that s sort of the utricle circus of politics. but luck. the bottom line is the trump campaign republican party writ large have decided that the way to put lipstick on this 34, 34 count conviction and 50 plus other indictments the trump is facing is to call this a political witch hunt and to insert politics into it there is no real basis. it has been the bunt as garland said, quite eloquently at the hearing yesterday the manhattan de a is