comparemela.com

Latest Breaking News On - Quora inc - Page 19 : comparemela.com

Exclusive-Questions-and-answers site Quora readies IPO-sources

Unsplash – NetworksAsia net

Unsplash – NetworksAsia net
networksasia.net - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from networksasia.net Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.

Quora Not Permitted Forensic Exam of Plaintiff s Electronic Devices in Data Breach Class Action

Cybersecurity your username 11 hours ago On Wednesday, Judge Beth Labson Freeman rejected Quora Inc.’s request for a reconsideration of its motion to compel a forensic examination of the electronic devices which the plaintiff used to access Quora in a case alleging a data breach was the company’s fault.  The question-and-answer social media platform took issue with Magistrate Judge Nathaniel Cousins’ “terse order” denying the motion, arguing that a forensic investigation could determine whether there was malware on the plaintiff’s connected devices. Such information would ostensibly test the plaintiff’s theory of causation because “a failure to meaningfully protect sensitive information residing on her own devices shows a general indifference to data security,” Quora argued.

A Case That Really Stands Out in a Crowd: Judge Abrams Awards Attorneys Fees Where Plaintiff Ignores Pleading Deficiencies For Three Months | Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler LLP

To embed, copy and paste the code into your website or blog: On December 10, 2020, United States District Judge Ronnie Abrams (S.D.N.Y.) granted Oath Inc. (“Oath”) and Quora, Inc. (“Quora”)’s motions for attorneys’ fees under 35 U.S.C. § 285. Section 285 permits courts to award reasonable attorneys’ fees to a prevailing party in exceptional cases. The standard was met here, according to Judge Abrams, most particularly because Plaintiff NetSoc, LLC (“NetSoc”) ignored deficiencies in its pleading for roughly three months after being informed of errors therein. Background NetSoc brought suit for infringement of U.S. Patent No. 9,978,107 (the “’107 Patent”), entitled

© 2024 Vimarsana

vimarsana © 2020. All Rights Reserved.