we ought to be asking right now is whether the obama administration has armed isis, these radical islamic terrorists, whether they ve armed them in syria. we know they ve armed some of the rebels. we haven t had an answer which they re arming and which they re not. you cannot win a battle against radical islamic terrorism if you re unwilling to utter the words radical islamic terrorism. if you believe this is an essential threat, as you do, you re putting that out here right now. let s talk about isis in air can, if this as much an existential threat that means that you would then be willing to talk to iran to work together because the u.s. and iran are on the same side as seeing isis and the radical islamic terrorism. absolutely not. that was the most surreal moment of secretary clinton s entire interview when she suggested that the united states could partner with iran. i don t understand why you would rule it out. let me explain. we re on the same side, if
out by december 2011. all combat forces. but that was a decision made by combat forces. combat forces. that s an important distinction. colonel, i just want to point out ambassador bremer was technically incorrect on that one issue, the status of forces signed by president bush did include withdrawal of all u.s. forces by 2011. there s plenty of blame to go around. when you look at this, given it was part of the surge, does the fault lie to you more with the bush or the obama administration? first, i have to commend you on the interview quliew yesterdh i watched in full. i don t know what kind of alternate universe bremer is living in that he had no responsibility when it was his decisions to to be baath-ify iraq that created the military basis for the insurgency is just a fantasy world. you know, most of the blame goes to the bush administration for getting us into iraq in first