tucker: in an order published, a new mexican judge granted bail to five dependents accused of holding 11 children at a desert compound in new mexico. some of the defendants were training those kids to commit mass shootings. at least one child appears to have died at the compound. but now, remarkably, all five adults are free to go on ad. $20,000 bond. the perspective, that is low. paul manafort by contrast is on trial for tax evasion, that s a crime that is a crime. as we notice in the last segment, the average sentence is a year and three months. paul manafort is facing over 300 years in prison for that and a federal judge placed in solitary confinement for several weeks. the difference is probably political.
offices and helpful energies of the fbi, he is, to me, unthinkable that he would be permitted to be anywhere near one of our intelligence agencies or any part of this government. tucker: so you ve covered the news for a long time. it wasn t that long ago that the left was, i think i m appropriately wary of bureaucrats who worked in secret of our entire intelligence apparatus and the idea of unelected, permanent it would ve been horrifying to them. now they are defending it. or am i missing something? you are actually on point. you deserve immense credit for bringing this prominent lead the national consciousness a month ago when you started taking upon the issue, why in the world are these people who are attacking the president of the united states personally permitted security clearances? how could that even s be
tucker: in the speech code that all of us live under, the only religion you can attack is christianity. if she subbed in another world great religion, other abrahamic faiths, she would be out of the race tomorrow. why is that? that s tricky. r i look at all the text that reference christianity that she had sent out and she did, you are correct, to lead up to the story that she d tweeted about a mother who killed her son because he was gay, that certainly is radical and wrong, reprehensible. absolutely correct to call out westborough, who pickets funerals of fallen soldiers. but these are fringe elements. these are the most fringe elements, calling them out. i do not want to control her
litter. i mean that with all sincerity. why is nobody trying to ban iphones or lululemon yoga pants or running shoes or any of the accessories the idle rich in our country. but it s kids balloons? i don t think 10,000 pants are being flown into the air and killing the wildlife and hurting our future. i do not think they are hurting tomorrow. not yet. tucker: they wind up in feels ultimately when they come out with a new lululemon stretch pants and you ve got to buy new ones and you throw make the old ones away. they wind up in the landfill.on that s a environment of disaster. another disaster! why do we allow why do we allow this thing right here? right! tucker: do you know what a pelican can do on that? pelicans choke on these by the thousands. why is there no movement to ban them? i do not think that s exactld true, but i think tucker: [cackling] but i think we have a good
status. they ve nothing to gain from populism, which is why they hate it. washington, d.c., voted for hillary clinton and number set represent a communist sham election, 96%. noww in an ultimate display of the way things really are in d.c.,gs two rival think tanks, reportedly rival, the center for american progress on the left, and the american enterprise institute on the left, have teamed up to publish a paper criticizing populism. a research fellow at the american enterprise was given knives to come on tonight. thank you for joining us. i m delighted to join you for this display of preppy sartorial flair. tucker: i love your tie. this is described as an effort to support democracy. and democratic values. that s one of the reasons why you oppose populist movements like brexit. expression of popular vote?