Sm he20 didnt talk about 2020. Would you agree President Trump was acting wrongly and corruptly that he was askingee r the investigation explicitly to help his 2020 election prospects . Yes, my experience as ten years as a prosecutor, you never have a defendant or someone whos engaging in misconduct who would ever explicitly say in this case, president zelensky, i am going to bribe you now or i am going to ask you for a bribe, i am going to extort you, thats not theto way these things work. Mr. Castor. You said about hunter biden going back to 2014 for burisma. Yes. President trump supported ukraine with aid and otherwise, 2017 and 2018, correct . We are going to keep an eye on thatee testimony in todays impeachment before the house judiciary. We have some Breaking News for you on that other story we have been monitoring. A long anticipated Justice Department Inspector General report on the investigation into the origins of the russia probe, the conduct of a career long Law Enforcement
The telematics provider alleges that its intellectual property is being stolen, along with other conduct. Motive claims Samsara’s allegations are meritless.
veteran journalist john solomon and also involved with these are some of the attorneys. mr. castor you ve been an investigator of the hillve and this is crazy, i ve never seen anything like this, you haven t either, would it be interesting towo note because mr. goldman chooses not to answer because he don t want to incriminate himself or the chairman or somebody else, would it be interesting to e,find, as you he dealt with committee staff, somebody to just have an epiphany or were they under direction by somebody to do that. it s obvious they were trying tos figure something out. wait.ur i have one thingme for mr. goldman, mr. goldman, we re used to committeeol and people and witnesses taking gratuitous shots at people they don t like. earlier today in your testimony, you made a comment that really goes to an interesting thing and i will go back to the chairman questioning motive, in your
a courtroom waiting to be heard at this point? no, this is just a 33-page missive from the department that shows what they will say in court down the line. laura jarrett, thanks for being with us tonight. joining us now, two cnn legal analysts, shane wu and carrie cordero. shane, does the justice department have a valid argument hre that there s no legislative purpose and it carries the risk of abuse? they do not. that was not a legal opinion, john, it was just, as laura said, an argument. i mean, when i worked at the department my understanding was the department defended our laws. here they seem inclined to either abandon them or find a way around them. this is just sully they re saying that they re questioning the motives. they re not in the business of questioning motive. they re in the business of doing legal analysis. there s no legal analysis in these 33 pages. as laura pointed out the doj says chairman neal proclaimed publicly several times he was committed to making
for being with us tonight. appreciate it. joining us now, two cnn legal analysts former federal prosecutor. you know, shan, does the justice department have a valid argument there s no legislative purpose and it carries a risk of abuse? they do not. that was not a legal opinion, john. it was just, as laura said, an argument. i mean when i worked at the department my understanding was the department defended our laws. here they seem inclined to either abandon them or to find a way around them, and this is just silly that they re saying that they question the motive. they re not in the business of questioning motive. they re in the business of doing legal analysis. there s no legal analysis in these 33 pages. carrie, as laura pointed out the doj says chairman neale proclaimed publicly several times he was committed to making the president s tax returns available to the public, which they say proves it is partisan and not for legislative reasons. do chairman neale s prior